| Author |
 Topic  |
|
cosmicsurfer
USA
496 Posts |
 Posted - 03 Aug 2005 : 06:16:33
|
Since the original "Antigravity Experimentation" messages were erased inadvertantly several months ago because of an error message that showed up during a software link analysis of the entire message board, I thought that it might be time to begin again a new message thread "Antigravity Research," and return to the quest to understand how Antigravity and Gravity might work in our Universe.
Well, needless to say I was upset that all my messages were erased. Especially since at that time I was trying to protect an individuals freedom of speech just prior to the disappearance of the posts, even though I did not necessarily agree with the complete views of the some what religious bent of the poster. Hopefully, we won't loose any more messages and our group can discuss without fear of suppression their ideas and toughts about our Universe. If anyone wants to see the old messages, you can do a search of the topic: Antigravity Experimentation and look at the cached messages.
A primary leader in Antigravity Research, John Searl has a new website:
SEARL EFFECT:
"The Searl Effect was discovered by John Roy Robert Searl in 1946. Put simply, it is a method of extracting clean and sustainable energy.
By definition, it is an effect based on magnetic fields that generates a continual motion of magnetized rollers around magnetized rings (also called plates) producing electrical energy.
Incidental effects include negative ionisation of surrounding air resulting in a cooling of temperature, and anti-gravitational characteristics under specific conditions.
Other expressions used to describe similar sources of energy include 'The Space Fabric', 'Quantum Energy field of Space' or 'Zero Point Energy'. This describes an unlimited and constant source of energy which can be made to flow when the correctly proportioned masses concerned are stimulated by the correct frequencies, therefore creating an 'open system'.
The idea of utilising this source of energy is the subject of various devices and experiments, most of which prove the existence of the energy but not a method to create a coherent and ordered flow to produce useful power. In contrast, Professor Searl has discovered that in order to create a steady and stable flow, all the masses of the device (and the stimulating frequencies) must conform to precise values determined mathematically by his Law of the Squares.
A machine constructed to these principles produces a stable and useful power output."
http://www.johnsearl.com/technology.html
Does Massive electrical charge change the dynamics of the greater Gravitational field? Mass fluctuactions, proton nucleonic spin, time energy dynamics around gravitational fields, are all interlinked somehow with a relativistic forward motion that interplays with many dimensional wave patterns that include Hot and cold energy; forward, reverse, and future time waves; and the possibility that there are both positive and negative gravitational forces being generated by all matter. The Searl Device is only one example of how gyroscopic dynamics can become a perpetual motion machine. The possibilities are enormous and allow for a far greater range of motion then we can presently comprehend. Including Time and energy dynamics that allow for cold fusion, cold welds, cold waves outside of gravity pressures, and cold bleeds from reverse time waves from antimatter. Forward Time waves just beyond this moment that leap forward and return as a loop. Hutchison Effect created levitation and time effects, clearly showing how electromagnetic mass fluctuations can be interferred with by frequencies and even the matrix itself reformed into new unknown materials.
John |
|
|
cosmicsurfer
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - 06 Aug 2005 : 15:49:41
|
Is there a relationship between negative fields as found in an electron and the crushing implosions of black hole singularities, and the generation of electromagnetic implosions caused by high energy pulsed electromagnetic currents?
Let's first take a look at the Los Alamos ATLAS PULSE POWER GENERATOR, located in Nevada nuclear weapon test site discharged nearly 19 million amps of current causing symmetrical implosions.
Here is a description of the experiment:
"During an experiment, electromagnetic energy would go sequentially from the generator to the ac-to-dc converter, through the inductor (optional), to the capacitor, and would finally be delivered to the target.
The Atlas capacitor bank would be designed to be flexible enough so that it has the capability to transfer energy in various quantities and within a spectrum of time intervals. The following is a description of what would happen during an experiment requiring maximum possible currents and generating the maximum possible magnetic fields from the facility.
When such an experiment setup was completed, power from the LANL electrical grid would be used to spin the generator to 1,800 revolutions per minute (rpm) over a period of 15 to 20 minutes (the generator may already be spinning for NHMFL experiments). When full speed is reached, a switch would close to allow electricity to flow from the generator to an 80-MW ac-to-dc converter. This converter would transform the high-voltage ac output of the generator to a low-voltage dc charging current in the inductor. The converter would provide this charging current for 3 to 5 seconds. When the peak current of 28 kiloamperes is reached, a switch would disconnect the converter from the inductor. The inductor would produce peak magnetic fields of 40,000 gauss (G) at the coil surface during this few-second interval.
When the inductor reaches 50 MJ of stored energy, various switches would close and open, and energy would be transferred to the capacitor bank, which consists of an array of Marx modules. Within 40 milliseconds, each stage in the Marx modules would acquire a voltage of 60 kilovolts. When the capacitor bank reaches full charge, switches would connect all of the modules into a series configuration, producing many times the original voltage (nominally <1 MV) at the terminals of the transmission line. At this time, the 36 MJ of energy stored in the capacitor bank would be discharged as electric current through the transmission line into a load or liner in the target chamber. The discharge would take approximately 10 ms. If the experiment requires low energy x-ray production, then Atlas may utilize a "plasma flow switch" in the electrical transmission section near the target to decrease the implosion time from several ms down to half a ms or less.
This very large current would produce a large magnetic field in the localized area around the target, causing it to implode, and possibly vaporize or melt, depending on the thickness of the metal. A light liner used inside the target would collide with itself on axis, producing a plasma and low energy x rays. A heavy liner used within the target would compress sample materials to high pressures or, when driven into a central target, would produce extremely high shock pressures that can produce partial material ionization. Solid shrapnel and vaporized molecules would be generated but would be stopped by the walls of the target chamber. Vaporized molecules would deposit onto the walls of the target chamber."
http://www.eh.doe.gov/nepa/eis/eis0236/vol3/appk.htm
"THE BLACK HOLE ELECTRON
Author: D. Di Mariod.dimario@infinito.itAbstract:
The theory presented in this article introduces new unknown relationships that may shed new light on the nature of matter. This theory allows the calculation of the gravitational constant (G) with a precision comparableto the other atomic constants, gives a direct relation between mass and charge of the electron without the need ofthe ubiquitous "classical electron radius" and generates a second fine structure constant while also offering the disconcerting possibility of an anti-gravitational force.
Keywords: black hole, electron, Planck charge, gravity, quantum physics.
The electron, whether you like it as a well defined shape or as a (more likely) hazy blob of wavelike matter, has not surrendered all of its secrets. The quark structure is a comprehensive description of the possible excited states of matter but has added little to the understanding of the intimate nature of the electron. What we need is a leapforward enabling us to glimpse at the core of this particle and find a viable relationship between what is supposed totake place inside and what is measured outside. This is not as easy as it sounds because the hypothesis putforward here is that the electron itself is a miniature black hole analog. Besides, it would be highly desirable to define the black hole with the Planck time and mass only and have all the electron properties of charge, mass, without introducing any additional parameters. In practice we should be able to define the electron using only the constant of gravitation, Planck's constant, and the speed of light.
PLANCK’S BLACK HOLE
It is not difficult to devise a black hole using some basic constants. The resulting object is rather meaningless until a new interpretation is applied on the nature of the electric force and look at it as a gravitational force changing with time, Planck's time, providing the frame of reference is the black hole itself. A spinning black hole of this kind would originate the electron mass and charge, the fine structure constant, and eventually provide a link between electricity and gravity."
www.journaloftheoretics.com/Articles/2-5/dimario.pdf&w=electron+black+hole&d=50706D4CF2&icp=1&.intl=us" target="_blank">http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&p=electron+black+hole&u=www.journaloftheoretics.com/Articles/2-5/dimario.pdf&w=electron+black+hole&d=50706D4CF2&icp=1&.intl=us
I would say that there appears to be a generalized concept of Gravitational conditions that exist at all levels between electrical force and the nucleonic center of Gravity. If positive high pressure outward energetics is the directional condition for electrical charge differentials, and the negative vortex is the condition for both matter forward time wave and antimatter reverse time wave that act as mini black holes with phased pulsed photon absorption and generation, then the balance between directions in the Gravitational Force is a condition of the negative vortex. I will address this further in looking at how the Nucleonic Forces which dictates the center of gravity can be manipulated causing levitation.
John |
 |
|
|
cosmicsurfer
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - 12 Aug 2005 : 15:06:11
|
Did Nazi Germany have ongoing research into development of antigravity aircraft? Take a look at a collection of Russian pictures of German Vril and Haunebu antigravity craft photos.
Here is the link to see the entire Russian archive:http://flyers.nm.ru/fdisks_naci.htm
With such advanced propulsion capabilities why did the Nazi's loose the war? Most likely the force fields caused any primitive type projectiles from on board guns to loose accuracy since the propulsion explosives would not carry enough speed to penetrate the extreme warping of aether around the vehicle. Now, if they had particle beam type weapons that penetrated the field at the speed of light all bets would have been off. It was a good thing that they did not have that technology, because if these pictures are for real they certainly were advanced.
John
|
|
|
|
cosmicsurfer
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - 13 Aug 2005 : 17:04:58
|
quote:
Originally posted by cosmicsurfer
Now I am blowing my mind check these photos out from the Russian Nazi archive of German antigrav ships. This collection of pictures denotes that the manufacturer is BMW. I wonder if the Allied Forces were able to capture this technology? If so we no doubt are way beyond this capability right now.
Here is the BMW Flugelrad:
Well, anyone ever heard of the foo fighters? Imagine a B29 crew seeing an unbelievable saucer shaped craft with Nazi SS insegnias and wondering how on earth they could have developed such technology. What do you think, is this real or did someone have one great time in photo shop? Looks like BMW did more then just build some incredibly great cars......
John
|
|
|
|
cosmicsurfer
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - 15 Aug 2005 : 14:15:05
|
Here is a description of the Nazi antigravity engine as used in the Vril and Haunebu craft:
The RFZ 3,4, and 6 were all prototypes that grew larger and more powerful in each subsequent model. They were built from 1934-1940. The RFZ-5 was renamed Haunebu in 1939 with the RFZ-7 becoming the Vril-1 Jager in 1941. These highly advanced disc aircraft were overseen by Himmler's SS- specifically, the SS Technical Branch Unit E-IV (Entwicklungsstelle 4) which was created to explore various alternative energies. This unit was tasked with developing both the Haunebu and Vril disc designs that utilized the world's first electro-magnetic-gravitic drive systems: the Vril and Thule Triebwerks.
These drives relied on Hans Coler's free energy Konverter coupled to a Van De Graaf band generator and Marconi vortex dynamo (a huge spherical tank of mercury) to create powerful rotating electromagnetic fields that affected gravity. Many have often inquired "why" then when war started in 1939 did Germany not use these advanced and unique machines in air combat? The simple truth lies in the fact that these machines, despite their superior overall performance to conventional piston-engined aircraft and early jets, could not be realistically adapted to any useful military role other than the most basic transport and recon work.
The strong electromagnetic engines were difficult to control and required a complex celestial navigation system to fly. While maximum speed and range were incredible for the time, the flight characteristics of the discs could not hope to imitate high-performance fighters like the Me Bf 109 or Fw 190. There was very little room for either offensive or defensive armament in these designs except for a few experimental light MG and MK cannons that proved impractical in flight and a rather large experimental Donar (Thunder) Kraftstrahlkanone (Strong Jet Cannon).
These guns tended to destabilize the discs badly and were eventually removed or replaced with lighter automated guns. The disc bodies themselves were not capable of carrying any ordnance at all internally or externally (no bombs, rockets, or missiles) and could make only turns of 22.5, 45, and 90 degrees.
http://www.dias9.com/ufo81-GERMAN-NAZI.htm#--------
Here is a link to Professor Fran De Aquino website on theoretical basis for gravity control:
"There is a correlation between gravitational mass and inertial mass, which allows the gravity control and reveals a new concept of spacecraft and aerospace flight..."
What is gravitational mass and inertial mass?
A: The physical property of mass has two distinct aspects, gravitational mass (Mg) and inertial mass (M). The gravitational mass produces and responds to gravitational fields. It supplies the mass factors in Newton's famous inverse-square law of Gravitation ( F=GMgMg'/r2). Inertial mass is the mass factor in Newton's 2nd Law of Motion ( F= M.a ).
What is the obtained expression for the correlation between gravitational mass and inertial mass?
A: The general form of the expression is given by the Eq.(41) of the paper Kinetic Quantum Theory Gravity. In the particular case of radiation of any type ( including sonic radiation ) the expression is obtained by substitution of (53) into (41). However, in the case of electromagnetic radiation that expression reduces to Eq.(55). This equation shows that elementary particles, atoms or molecules, can have their gravitational masses reduced, nullified or even made negative by means of absorption or emission of electromagnetic radiation of extreme-low frequency (ELF). In addition, one can easily conclude from the Eq.(58) that the gravity control on bodies with very-high magnetic permeability and/or very-high electric conductivity (superconducting materials) requests radiation with less power density than other materials. In practice, this means that the gravity control on these materials is more easier than on the other. ( The weight, as we know, is given by the product of body's gravitational mass by the acceleration due to the gravity.).
Was the validity of the equation of correlation checked experimentally?
A: Yes. Two different experiments were carried out to check the expression of correlation. Both experiments showed that the experimental results are in agreement with the theoretical predictions.
What happens when the body's gravitational mass is nullified?
A: Theoretically, when the gravitational mass of a body is nullified the body's weight is also nullified. ( Remember that the weight = gravitational mass x acceleration due to the gravity.). Under these circumstances, the body will be totally free of the gravitational action, in any point of the universe. However, the gravitational mass will never be null due to the existence of a minimum value for mg ( quantization of gravitational mass, see p.4). But the experimental results show that it is possible to reduce the weight of specific materials up to 0.000001% of their initial weight.
What happens when the body's gravitational mass is negative?
A: In that case, the body is repulsed from the Earth. The repulsion force will be directly proportional to the gravitational mass of the body.
What is a practical application for this?
A: For example, it will be possible to raise much weighed loads without cranes aid. This will be of fundamental importance to engineering, ports and general transport of loads. It will also be very important to the spacecraft propulsion. It will also be possible to produce mechanical and electric energy in a cheaper way and with less pollution.
How will it be possible to produce electric energy from the control of the gravitational mass?
A: Consider two interconnected spheres by means of a rigid bar, in which center there is an axis which allows the bar to rotate around itself. If the gravitational mass of one of the spheres is made negative, it will weigh "upwards " while the other will weigh "down", consequently the system will rotate around the central axis. We will be then converting gravitational energy ( from the system Earth-spheres) into mechanical energy of rotation. Therefore, it is enough to connect an alternator (broadly available in the market) in order to convert the mechanical energy into electric energy. In this way, it will be possible to supply locally (without the need of transmission lines and distribution networks) the consumption of electric energy so much of the consumer of low consumption as well as the great consumers (more than 1000kVA).
Does this mean then that a person in the most remote area of the planet can have a portable source of electric energy capable of supplying all his needs?
A: Yes. This is the fundamental aspect of the discovery: There won't be monopoly of energy.
Isn't system above mentioned in order to explain the conversion of the gravitational energy into mechanical energy a Motor?
A: Yes. It has been the starting point for the conception of the Gravitational Motor, published in the article: "How to Extract Energy Directly from a Gravitational Field.", where we show that it is possible to build Gravitational Motors with power up to 214HP. Motors of this type would have cost and size similar to the current motors used in our vehicles, so that they can substitute them with advantage. Besides, the Gravitational Motors won't need gasoline or diesel to work (its fuel is the universal gravitational energy ) and practically they don't pollute the atmosphere.
http://users.elo.com.br/~deaquino//ING.htm
Kinetic Quantum Theory of Gravity
http://users.elo.com.br/~deaquino//
John |
|
|
|
cosmicsurfer
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - 17 Aug 2005 : 05:50:35
|
If you are a surfer then of course you would love to own a gravity wave rider. The surfer's dream machine and it appears that even NASA has looked into riding self induced gravity waves:
The Challenge To Create The Space Drive
Marc G. Millis
NASA Glenn Research Center
ABSTRACT
"To travel to our neighboring stars as practically as envisioned by science fiction, breakthroughs in science are required. One of these breakthroughs is to discover a self-contained means of propulsion that requires no propellant. To chart a path toward such a discovery, seven hypothetical space drives are presented to illustrate the specific unsolved challenges and associated research objectives toward this ambition. One research objective is to discover a means to asymmetrically interact with the electromagnetic fluctuations of the vacuum. Another is to develop a physics that describes inertia, gravity, or the properties of spacetime as a function of electromagnetics that leads to using electromagnetic technology for inducing propulsive forces. Another is to determine if negative mass exists or if its properties can be synthesized. An alternative approach that covers the possibility that negative mass might not exist is to develop a formalism of Mach’s Principle or reformulate ether concepts to lay a foundation for addressing reaction forces and conservation of momentum with space drives.
DIAMETRIC DRIVE
This first type of hypothetical field propulsion, as illustrated in Fig. 4, considers the possibility of creating a local gradient by the juxtaposition of diametrically opposed field sources across the vehicle. This is directly analogous to the "negative mass" propulsion suggested by Bondi 12, Winterberg 13 and Forward. 14 The diametric drive can also be considered analogous to creating a pressure source and sink in a space medium as suggested previously with the Induction Sail."
Negative mass propulsion is not a new concept. It has already been shown that is theoretically possible to create a continuously propulsive effect by the juxtaposition of negative and positive mass and that such a scheme does not violate conservation of momentum or energy. A crucial assumption to the success of this concept is that negative mass has negative inertia."
http://www.lerc.nasa.gov/WWW/bpp/TM-107289.htm
NUCLEONIC GRAVITON BOMBARDMENT, GRAVITY FIELD WAVES, AND DIFFERENTIAL FALL RATES:
".....It is the nucleonic angular momentum or velocity that determines the acceleration of the atom downwards due to the Magnus effect. The total effect is on the entire mass. Thus, two masses of equal weight but different composition can have different nucleonic forces which alter their accelerations."
Boynton's experiment which used the side of a mountain to gravitationally attract the disc horizontally [which would not be affected by the Earth's attraction because that is acting vertically and is counteracted by the supporting wire] would have greater acceleration from the aluminum than the beryllium side and thus a torque would be created to turn the aluminum towards the mountain.
If the force of neutrons is multiplied by .8424633 [p33], it equates with the force of protons and thus the force of both nucleons can be expressed as proton force. It was shown on p33 that since the neutron has 68.4922602% of the angular momentum of the proton, one half of the remaining 31.5073398% negates the other half due to the third vortex around a proton. Even though the effect on emanating waves is negated, it is still there and has to be taken into account when calculating the spin velocity of the average nucleon from which the orbital velocity is calculated. It is the orbital velocity that controls gravity, the ratio of which matches the ratio of dropping times.
The proton force can be thought of as the total spin angular momentum of the proton[even though part of it cannot be measured] which becomes a force through the Magnus equation when it meets resistance. Continuous force becomes gravitational acceleration
When an element's nucleonic force is calculated in terms of proton force per unit mass, it can be expressed by this author's equation:
F = [qN + P]/m
where q is the calculated factor equal to .8424633, N the number of neutrons, P the number of protons and m is the mass in terms of amu or atomic mass units [atomic weight]. If it is to be compared to the ratio of drop times, F must be inversed, as in table 1 [p32 & 33], because a greater force results in less dropping time.
The Orbital Curve of Matter in Motion- A New Cosmic Principle, Found by this Author, to Explain Planetary Spin
With reference to p183 and Sun's rotation p159
Since the Sun's gravitational field, its etheron field and its particle field is accompanied by waves of energy radiating outward through these fields, as well as revolving around with the spinning Sun and because they penetrate to every atom of every planet they cause the planets to orbit the Sun. The Sun revolves faster than the planets in orbit and thus its fields sweep and carry the planets in the direction of its spin.
At this point, an important principle is evoked. The balance between gravitational and centrifugal force maintains a curved orbital path, for the planet, around the Sun. Now, when a planet is forced to travel this curved path a point on the outer side [away from the Sun] is forced to move faster than a point on the inner side because it has a longer orbit to travel in the same time. In the absence of any greater forces in opposition, this causes the planet to spin because the force attempts to make this point revolve around the one on the inside. Of course, the next point in line is subjected to the same force once the spin commences. The amount of force depends upon the diameter of the planet [i.e. the distance between the orbits of the inside and outside surfaces] and thus the difference of their orbital lengths. The smaller the planet, the longer the spin period because there is less force. This is true of the planets in the solar system, from Earth outward, thereby providing evidence for this concept.
The gravitational field of the Sun does not consist of gravitational waves of specific parameters but just simply waves of any description, primarily the finer waves, that emanate from the Sun that create the Magnus effect in the nucleonic structure of the bodies being affected. Because of the inverse square law, there is a greater concentration of waves near the prime source and thus a greater gravitational effect. In nearby bodies such as Mercury and Venus [to a great extent] near the Sun and in the Moon next to the Earth, gravitational force is greater than the spin force and thus the spin is counteracted as gravitational force tries to direct the satellites towards the center of the prime source, against the momentum, like a ball on a tether. From the Earth outward, the spin is less and less affected by the Sun's gravity but the spin force also decreases due to a spreading of the waves. This latter is offset by the outer planets being larger and the arc of their orbit being flatter.
The orbital length of the outer point, on any planet, divided by the orbital length of the inner point is the exact same ratio as the orbital velocity of the outer point divided by the orbital velocity of the inner point. The outer orbit is longer so the outer point moves faster, in orbit, than the inner point. Relative to the planet, the inner and outer points travel at the same velocity but in different solar directions as the planet spins. Part of the inner velocity forwards, along the orbital path, would be canceled by its backward motion.
Let us examine this principle using Earth as an example. The following data is used for Earth from Van Nostrand's Scientific Encyclopedia, fifth edition, and from calculations herein with new formula by this author.
Equatorial circumference = 4007516119 cm. Equatorial radius = 637816000 cm.: Equatorial velocity = 46518.96873 cm./s.: Orbital radius = 1.49597870 X 10 to the thirteenth cm.: Orbital period = 31471949 seconds: Rotational period = 23.93 hours [mean sidereal day].
Since the orbital radius is to the Earth's center, the orbital radius to the inner point is this minus one half of the diameter and to the outer point it is this plus one half of the diameter. The orbital radius to the inner point = 1.495914918 X10 to the thirteenth cm. and its circumference is 9.399110633 X 10 to the thirteenth cm. To the outer point it is 1.496042481 X 10 to the thirteenth and its circumference is 9.399912135 X 10 to the thirteenth.
The orbital circumference divided by its orbital period equals its orbital velocity. The outer velocity = 2986758.823 cm./s. The inner velocity = 2986504.14 cm./s. The inner velocity [relative to the Earth]is 2986504.14 cm./s minus 46518.96873 cm./s [Earth's present average velocity of rotation backward along the orbit] which is 2939985.171 cm./s. The difference beween the two is 46773.652 cm./s which is the surplus of the outer, that is greater than the inner, after the two are equalized by Earth. This surplus goes into the rotation of the planet. By dividing the Earth's circumference by this surplus we obtain the Earth's rotational period, the result of which is 85678.9228 seconds. This equals 23.8 hours. Since we are now seeing this from the orbital point of view, we compare this to the mean sidereal day, or one revolution, of 23.93 hours. This difference of only 7.8 minutes is small. However, there is another force involved. These calculations were applied to an isolated Earth, in the absence of other forces, which means before the moon was captured by the Earth, passing close to it, while they both were in orbit in the same direction around the sun [p.159 within the section titled "The Origin of the Solar system" p.147] For a period after capture, it would only affect the Earth periodically as it came close in its orbit and then went way out. It would not much affect the slowing of Earth's rotation until it settled into a more circular orbit. Astronomers calculate that the gravitational effect of the moon is increasing the Earth's rotational period by 1.5 milliseconds per century. The 7.8 minutes, above, can be accounted for by the moon if it finally reached this more circular orbit by about 30 million years ago. This is one half of the time since the extinction of the dinosaurs which would have occurred during the first close encounters. The more circular orbit at 30 million years ago seems reasonable. On p156 it is mentioned that Dr.Ovenden, head of the Astronomy Dept. at U.B.C. Vancouver, Canada, with the help of a computer, had determined that the area now occupied by the asteroid belt had contained matter 90 times the mass of the Earth that suddenly disappeared 16 million years ago. This was undoubtably captured by Jupiter as described. The oldest rocks on Earth are three billion years old. If the planets took this long to form in the standing wave nodes before clearing the area between them so that they could move to balance gravity and centrifugal force and thus capture moons etc., then it is not improbable that the Earth captured our moon 60 to 70 million years ago as described, along with the evidence thereof, and which would have occurred a little earlier in time. This close correlation establishes this new Cosmic principle.
Contrary to Einstein's theory, it is not space that is curved but only the paths, within space, of particles or bodies that are forced to follow them by the combination of gravitational and centrifugal forces.
In summation,when viewed from above, a planet will curve to the left when orbiting in the direction of the sun's rotation. This causes a spin of the planet of a like rotation as outlined and proven by using orbital data to calculate the spin of the Earth. However, if a planet or particle is caused to spin, such as by collision, a reverse orbit would occur with the arc curving to the right in the absence of other forces. If there is still a gravitational force emanating from a focal point, the object would either orbit in the reverse direction [as some planetary satellites] or else counteract some of the gravitational force thus changing the orbital radius or else tilting the planet's spin axis [as that of Uranus]. In the case of particles in a cloud chamber, their spiral, or corkscrew, path is explained by this principle.
Spin Curvature - A new name, herein , for the new Cosmic Principle
The laws of the macrocosm can again be demonstrated to apply to the microcosm. In the process Spin Curvature can again be established.
For example, let us examine a group of etherons, the medium of the Universe, which form the lowest energy electromagnetic particle by making up the first vortex particle capable of emitting field waves. This particle is known to be part of what is called background radiation with a measured energy of 2.73K. It was called the 3K or 2.73K particle. It is called herein the kaytron. From this energy it was calculated [p.10] that its wavelength is .177 cm., at the bottom of the infrared spectrum, and its energy in terms of ergs equals 1.122303723 X 10 to the minus fifteenth ergs. h [Planck's constant] used in these calculations = 6.626176 X 10 to the minus twenty seventh erg seconds. Velocity, from E = hv/wavelength equals 2.997925 X 10 to the tenth cm./s. which is light speed as measured on Earth. Its mass can also be calculated. On page 6, the mass of the etheron was derived to be 7.372615 X 10 to the -48th gms. Since energies are proportionate to masses, if kaytron energy is divided by 6.626176 X 10 to the -27th ergs, which is the energy of an etheron close to absolute zero, and made equal to the kaytron mass divided by the etheron mass, it is found that the mass of the kaytron is 1.2487313 X 10 to the -36 gms. This can also be verified by E = MCsquared, the conversion equation for matter at rest or at light speed. Its radius can also be calculated. 1.2487313 X 10 to the -36 gms.[kaytron] / 7.372615 X 10 to the -48 gms. [etheron] = .1693743 X 10 to the 12th = the number of etherons in a kaytron. Etheron radius [p7] = 9.983 X 10 to the -23rd cm. The volume of the etheron = [9.983 X 10 to the -23]cubed X 4/3pi =4167.463671 X 10 to the -69th cubed. The volume of the kaytron = 4167.463671 X 10 to the -69th X .1693743 X 10 to the 12th = 7.058612421 X 10 to the -55 cm.cubed. When divided by 4/3pi rcubed = 1.68.5119587 X10 to the -57th. r for the kaytron = 5.52344765 X 10 to the -19 cm. which is over 1100 times smaller than that of the electron.
Since the kaytron has a wavelength of .177 cm. and travels in a spiral or coiled path, as do all particles, with this wavelength being the measure between adjacent points on the coil,after once around the coil, the wave has an amplitude. The wave energy is known to be proportionate to the amplitude squared. A table was found on the internet which gives five examples of energy and the corresponding squares of the amplitudes found by them as follows shown by the numerical values.:
Energy - - - - - - - - - - Amplitude Squared
2099.66 - - - - - - - - - - - 100
8441.44 - - - - - - - - - - - 400
19058 - - - - - - - - - - - - 900
33727.2 - - - - - - - - - - - 1600
76101.9 - - - - - - - - - - - 3600
If the energy is divided by the amplitude squared, the five examples have an average ratio of 21.1. If the energy [ergs] of a kaytron is divided by 21.1, this = the amplitude squared which = 5.31897 X 10 to the -17th. The wave amplitude is thus 7.2931269 X 10 to the-9th cm. The direct circumference of this amplitude = 2piA = 4.5824068458 X 10 to the -8th cm. When the wavelength , .177 cm., is added to this, the total length of travel over the spiral wavelength = .1770000458 cm.. Propagation through space near Earth is 2.997925 X 10 to the 10th cm./s. If this is divided into .177 cm. the period is obtained which = 5.09040836579 X 10 to the -12th. The spiral wavelength velocity = C/P = 3.47712861289333 X 10 to the 10th cm./s. The spin curvature principle can now be applied.
The radius of the innermost point = 7.2931269 X 10 to the -9th [A] - 5.5234479 X10 to the -19th cm. = 7.2931268994 X 10 to the -9th cm. Its circumference = 4.5284067778 X 10 to the -8th cm. + .1770000458 cm. When divided by P, V = 34771295130.9749 cm./s. After subtracting the retrograde spin velocity of 2.997925 X 10 to the 10th cm/s, its velocity along its orbit is 4.7920361289333 X 10 to the -9th cm./s. The radius of the outermost point = 7.2931269 cm. + 5.5234479 X 10 to the -19th = 7.2931269006 X 10 to the -9th cm. The circumference = 4.5824067785 X 10 to the -8th cm. After adding .1770000458 it equals .1770000916 cm. After dividing by P, it equals V which = 34771295130.9749 cm./s. The outer V - the inner V =2.99792590020416 X 10 to the 10th cm./s which is the surplus velocity that goes into spin. Though the inner and outer radii and circumferences are different, the calculator couldn't handle any difference in velocities but the calculations show that the surplus outer velocity was essentially that of light speed for the spin of the kaytron, equal to that of propagation speed or showing that kinetic and potential energies are equal as outlined herein. We are not attempting to determine the rotation rate from the surplus velocity of the outer point since we need to know this before determining the surplus. We are verifying the rotation rate with the orbital data to show that orbital curvature is responsible for the rotation rate or possibly, in some cases, it is vice versa."
http://www.spacetelescopes.com/additions.html
LEVITATION:
Levitation is rising, rather than falling, of objects, the opposite of gravitation. It has been shown that gravitation is due to the spin of nucleons. If they spin in the opposite direction, with respect to the Earth, levitation will occur. Electrons, when they reach a nucleon after going through the electron barrier in an atom, can, at the right frequency, reverse the spin axis of the nucleon. If over fifty per cent of the nucleons in the object are reversed, the object will levitate away from the Earth's surface. If it is less than fifty per cent, the object merely loses weight."
The following movie demonstrates the loss of weight of an object on a balance scale. A plastic case containing brass screws rises when the switch is on and falls when it is shut off. It will repeat as many times as the switch is turned on and off and instantly reacts. The second picture shows a block of wood doing the same thing. These are placed close to the electron source while the opposite side of the scale is further away and any effect on it is minimized by the inverse square law. This, of course, goes down when the target goes up. Note that the two pointers are even when balanced and when the target gets lighter its pointer goes up while its opposite goes down. This reverses when the switch is shut off and they come to balance again.[They can be seen on each side of the center scale]
This is all done without the solid state power supply, special coil and other equipment needed to lift heavier weights. The only power used was for a small two and one half inch diameter electric motor. The electron generator in this demonstration is not powerful enough to drive the electrons farther than just shallow penetration, but it is enough to show that levitation can be accomplished on demand which is necessary to be able to harness it. Once equipment is used to drive the electrons further so that they penetrate deeply enough into the atom, weight will have no limit since the force comes from the angular momentum of the nucleon, itself, [just as gravitation causes objects to drive themselves down] and so the more weight, the more nucleons there are and thus the more force to lift the extra weight, a minute fraction of which is enough to maintain the spin orientation of the nucleon.
The third picture shows the same 2X2 wood block on a different scale. It goes up and towards the electron source. It stops about 1/2 inch or so after rising because it is as close to the source as it can get. In the first picture, it stopped because that was the limit of the scale. In case someone thinks that the electrons are driving the electrons in the wood to the opposite side leaving protons [positive] which try to move towards the source, it should be remembered that it is electrons that move towards protons [which are called holes], not vice versa. Electrons should repel the electrons in the atoms of the wood but these are attached to protons in the nucleus of the atom by standing waves and thus the whole block of wood should be repelled by the electrons from the source. Electrons do dislodge atoms from the surface of material. The only way that electrons from the source can cause material to move towards the source is through the Magnus effect, described under gravitation, which must overcome the repulsion effect by electrons. When sufficient force is applied to reach over 50% of the nucleons in an atom and thus over 50% of the atoms in the material, that is when the atoms in the material can continue to levitate the whole material at once towards the electron source. If the source stays ahead of the motion by being attached, the motion is continuous.
It is not the source attracting the target. It is the nucleon in the target that is pushing itself in the direction of the source due to the Magnus effect of the independent electrons from the source. A baseball pitcher is not applying force to curve a baseball. The ball is curving its own path by spinning and forcing the air molecules to go to one side like that of an airplane wing lifting because the stream of air, forced over the wing, causes a lower pressure than that underneath [Bernoulli equation]. Attraction of one particle to another is not a drawing of it towards it. If the other is not spinning, firing smaller particles at it [as is the common theory] would not draw it. It would repel it. If spinning, the Magnus effect takes place as described herein. These references to the attraction due to the Magnus effect do not apply to those particles that attract due to the standing waves set up between them because they have the same wavelength and frequency or the harmonics thereof.
LEVITATION VIDEO:
http://www.spacetelescopes.com/melclip1.avi
http://www.spacetelescopes.com/melclip2.avi
http://www.spacetelescopes.com/melclip3.avi
Side note: Mel Winfield helped John Hutchison create the famous experiments that led to the Hutchison Effect.
John |
|
|
|
cosmicsurfer
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - 28 Aug 2005 : 17:04:32
|
If Mel Winfield is correct in regards to electromagnetic field states of the proton having a direct relationship to the directional force of gravity, then the question might be asked as to how the proton works regarding spin in the first place and further what are the actual spin dynamics or changes in the proton electromagnetic field geometries that create repulsive states?
Here is the latest information regarding the internal workings of the proton:
"The Electron-Proton Storage Ring HERA started operations in 1992. It collides electrons of 27.6 GeV (1 GeV = 1.000.000.000 electron volts) with protons of 920 GeV. It provides a resolution which is more than ten times better than that achieved by the best experiments at CERN and FNAL.
Now let us take a closer look at the proton. The gluon-strings between the quarks inside the proton can break and at the ends quarks and antiquarks appear. One has therefore to expect a dynamical mixture of quarks, antiquarks and gluons, in contrast to just three quarks of the naive proton model.
The measurements at HERA provide such a close up picture. They show that the number of quark-antiquarks pairs inside the proton is unexpectedly large. The figure shows the new measurements together with old measurements at lower energy. The variable x is a measure of the energy of the quark inside the proton. The HERA measurements are a probe of the quarks and antiquarks inside the proton at small x-values. Their number rises fast as one goes to small x-values. This was a great surprise, since the old measurements had not hinted at such a behavior.
The proton, according to HERA measurements: It is densely filled with quarks, antiquarks and gluons."
http://www.desy.de/f/hera/engl/chap2.html
The HERA results are from extreme energy collisions of electrons with protons producing streams of quarks and antiquarks. Obviously, the electromagnetic fields of the protons are shattered during such an experiment, and thus we might be looking at a window into the modulation process itself that unpacks higher frequencies from two succinct time domains that are interconnected by a twisting string of two way gluon light fields as a generalized signature of the larger universe hyperdimensional spin dynamics. In the matter universe most likely the quarks would dominate and be in synchronous spin with the graviton flux fields that penetrate to the center of gravity. So, if Mel is correct that spin might be reversed to redirect gravity, then what we may be seeing is the normal patterns of dominance of forward time quarks change under a redirection of the geometry of the electromagnetic fields creating a greater frequency stream of modulation of the reverse time antiquarks within the proton.
Before we get too carried away in our speculations let’s take a look at the standard model of atomic polarity and charge that is our present basis for atomic interactions; however, the standard model does not explain higher dimensional interactions that are responsible for the condensation of matter in the first place within this dimension, and the relationship of these frequencies in regards to actual release of thermodynamic flows of electromagnetic energies due to the changes in the geometries of electromagnetic fields that surround all matter:
STANDARD DEFINITION BALANCE OF CHARGE:
"Atoms, the smallest particles of matter, are made of protons, electrons, and neutrons. Protons have a positive charge, Electrons have a negative charge that cancels the proton's positive charge. Neutrons are particles that are similar to a proton but have a neutral charge. There are no differences between positive and negative charges except that particles with the same charge repel each other and particles with opposite charge attract each other. If a solitary positive proton and negative electron are placed near each other they will come together to form a hydrogen atom. This repulsion and attraction (force between stationary charged particles) is known as Electrostatic Force and extends theoretically to infinity, but is diluted with distance.
Both atoms and the universe have a neutral charge overall and come with the same number of protons and electrons. When an atom has one or more missing electrons it is left with a positive charge, and when an atom has at least one extra electron it has a negative charge. Having a positive or a negative charge makes an atom an ion. Atoms only gain and lose protons and neutrons through fusion, fission, and being radioactive. Although atoms are made of many particles and objects are made of many atoms, they behave similar to charged particles in terms of how they repel and attract.
In an atom the protons and neutrons combine to form a tightly bound nucleus. This nucleus is surrounded by a vast cloud of electrons circling it at great distance held near the protons by electromagnetic attraction. The cloud exists as a series of overlapping shells / bands in which the inner valence bands are filled with electrons and are tightly bound to the atom. The outer conduction bands contain no electrons except those that have accelerated to the conduction bands by gaining energy. With enough energy an electron will escape an atom. When an electron in the conduction band decelerates and falls to another conduction band or the valence band emitting an photon, is known as the photoelectric effect."
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Physics_in_English:Charge
Now let's take a look at an interpretation of Ampere's 1825 laws that explain the phase dynamics of electromagnetic spin of waves in creating harmonic balance as an alternative to positive and negative charge:
(A review)Ampere's 1824 Laws
By Daniel Fitzpatrick
Abstract
“These relative motion laws greatly simply all of science:
These laws are essentially Ampere's simple 1824 long wire laws with a frequency modification. .These are universal laws that unify all the forces by seeing all forces as space-time creations similar to the way it's done in general relativity. . These laws, though, visualize different space-time intervals (different gauges) being created at various different spin/orbit frequencies.
Despite the fact that quantum theory does not see our type of spin causing angular momentum in the microcosm, these laws show it is there nevertheless but at a different space-time interval (different gauge - - different spin/orbit frequency level).
The "A" Laws
[The reason these "A" Laws work relates to the superposition principle that there is no repulsive force with in phase waves but a repulsive force (space) is always generated by out of phase waves].
You must also understand Dr. Milo Wolff's concept that particles (and time) are manufactured by scalar, standing wave, resonances with an immense, finite number of similar surrounding entities (Mach's principle).
Force (space) exists not DIRECTLY via scalar resonances but because of individual vector spin and orbital resonances between two similar scalar standing wave entities.
It is from the abovementioned scalar, standing wave entity, spin/orbital resonances that we derive these "A" Laws.
Remember, these "A" Laws (Ampere or Aufbau) have unified ALL the forces so these are now the NEW laws for everything, from the smallest spinning particle to the largest spinning super cluster of galaxies even where high relativistic speeds and mass are encountered.
* The 1st. "A" Law shows us where all objects in relative motion produce the least space-time between themselves:
The space time interval is created the least between any two objects, the closest sides of which "see" themselves spinning or moving on parallel paths in the same direction at the same frequency (like gears meshing) or a close harmonic thereof. You can also say these two objects will attract each other.
* The 2nd. "A" Law shows us where all objects in relative motion produce the most space-time between themselves:
Both space and time are created the most between any two objects, the closest sides of which "see" themselves spinning or moving on parallel paths in opposite directions at the same frequency (like gears clashing) or a close harmonic thereof. You can also say these two objects will repel each other.
I use the quoted word "see" to emphasize the particular spacetime realm in which these entities actually find themselves although this will NOT be the way it is seen from our particular spacetime reference frame realm.
Of great importance, in the two preceding laws, is that these laws are frequency laws and they work separately for each separate spin/orbit frequency level which means these individual wave-particles must "see" themselves doing these things from their viewpoint in their local gauge environment. It does not matter how some other spin/orbit frequency level views these things because space and time and indeed the average space time interval is entirely different for each different spin/orbit frequency level (gauge).
These two laws look equal and opposite but they are not: The 1st "A" law "locks on" while its opposite 2nd sister law never does. This is because the total force is generally centralized and you can feel this 1st "A" law "lock on" when two magnets come together. These two laws result in limits of aggregation being established all throughout this universe: This is why there are limits to the size of atoms and limits to the size of stars as well.
* The Aufbau or Ampere Corollary.
The aforementioned forces, or space-time intervals, between two objects will vary proportionally with the cosine of the angle of their paths. And they will have a torque that will tend to make the paths parallel and to become oriented so that objects on both paths will be traveling in the same direction.
Or
All objects that "see" themselves traveling in the same direction on parallel paths at the same frequency will attract and/or space and time, at that frequency, between them is created the least.
All objects that "see" themselves traveling in opposite directions on parallel paths at the same frequency will repel and/or space and time between them, at that frequency, increases or is created the most.
And please don't forget this: Why electrons, stars & galaxies repel each other. Remember, we have completely chucked out all those invisible forces you are familiar with and all we have now are these two "A" Laws.
Please remember, in this new "big picture" of everything, ALL FORCES ARE NOW UNIFIED so there are no such things as gravity, magnetic lines of force or plus and minus charges or for that matter even the strong force.
Please pay particular attention to the following.
Electrons can exhibit either an attraction or repulsion when they are "locked" spin up or spin down on orbitals such as like or unlike charges; like or unlike poles OR they may even display a gyroscopic type repulsive behavior when they are "free". Our "A" Laws show us why this is so and in the next 8 paragraphs you have the best explanation of why electrons and even stars & galaxies repel each other.
Lets look at these free electrons first: They spin and hence they have inertial qualities and this includes gyroscopic inertia which always provides this force 90 degrees to any external force acting on such a spinning item.
Completely forget about charge now and only look at our new "A" Laws and what they say. The 1st "A" Law tells us that there is a possibility that two free electrons can attract each other providing that any portion of their closest sides are spinning in the same direction at the same frequency. This means either their sides can be spinning in the same directions or they can be lined up so that both of their poles can be spinning in the same directions: Any such two electrons will attract each other (magnetism also sigma and pi bonding).
Then we see that there is something else: This torque twisting force - on BOTH free items - depends on the cosine of the angle of their respective spin planes.
As this force begins to act, it in turn causes this 90-degree gyroscopic torque to twist both of those totally free electrons away from this initial attracting position, doesn't it?
So because of this gyro torque, two free electrons can never remain in a full attracting position and they will therefore be forced to stay more in a repelling position. Therefore free electrons will always end up repelling each other and this repelling is not explained by using this thing called charge: it is explained only by simply using global inertial qualities and our new global "A" Laws.
The above 8 paragraphs explain not only why electrons repel each other but they also explain why any two perfectly free similar spinning objects of the same size must repel each other. So now you know why both electrons and galaxies stay well away from each other.
This is Einstein's cosmological constant.
Something somewhere has to be "locked" in place and synchronized in frequency (such as the electron's spin with another electron's spin) or a close subharmonic to get any kind of attracting force:
Yes, the proton attracts an electron but instead of charge please see it this way:
When two up quarks combine with one down quark to form a proton then the two up quarks are able to synchronize in with the electron's spin frequency and "lock" two electrons thereby preventing these electrons from precessing or wobbling and therefore the up quarks can attract the electrons.
This is why aggregations come together (gravity) and larger aggregations come together and accumulate because as these things grow in size there are more things "locked" in place strengthening the attractive force of the 1st "A" Law.
Once we knew about quarks then we should have realized how those two 'up quarks' in the proton are set up spin up-spin down (The 'up quark' does not signify orientation). Those two spin up--spin down 'up quarks' are spinning - in the same equatorial plane - at a higher frequency but all 'up quarks' spin at a harmonic of the electron's spin frequency allowing a spin up and spin down electron to be attracted to them in the same equatorial plane. We will soon know even more about the attractive quark strong force binding functions. Attraction is always a synchronized frequency attraction and it is not simply the old idea of plus and minus charges.
All attractions in this theory must be synchronized frequency attractions. Both light and inertial mass are caused by these synchronized frequency attractions.
As quantum theory shows us, the orbital of an electron on a distant star goes down a certain amount while the orbital of the electron receiving this quantum of energy---in your eye---goes up the exact same amount. But what quantum mechanics does not tell you is that these two energy-exchanging orbitals must be in the same exact plane. Not only that but each orbital must be a mirror image of the other with the electrons in each rotating and revolving in the exact opposite directions so that at the time the energy exchange takes place the closest sides of both electrons are going in the same direction. You can see from this that this energy change is merely a MOMENTARY DIRECT PULL from the electron, on the star, to the electron in your eye. These electrons will make many revolutions, rotations and wobbling oscillations during each change of those orbitals giving you the light that you see.
If two distant quarks are lined up so that their closest sides are in the same directions as the two aforementioned electrons then they too will momentarily bind with each other---even from a vast distance---and cause what we see as inertial mass. But since the quarks in the proton and neutron tri-quark entities do not oscillate and wobble quite like the electron then this pull of the two quarks is a steady momentary binding pull where BOTH quarks are pulled away from the other two quarks but NO PERMANENT Energy CHANGE is made in either tri-quark entity (neutron or proton).
When you spin a flywheel and notice the gyroscopic inertia, you should also notice that the gyroscopic torque that is always 90 degrees to the axis of rotation can also be seen as a linkage with the rim of the rapidly spinning flywheel to a path projected in the sky (macrocosm surroundings). The rim tries to stay in this path. This is showing you that you do have an absolute reference frame, which is Mach's principle. Billions of quarks in BOTH the flywheel and in the macrocosm are both being momentarily extended more than normal thus giving you this added gyroscopic inertia.
You might have to read the long TOE at http://www.rbduncan.com/TOEbyFitzpatrick.htm to get the full picture of what happens when you crank up a gyroscope or a flywheel or ride a bicycle and produce gyroscopic inertia. It's similar to the reason you need cyclic pitch on a helicopter. When a helicopter moves forward then the blades on one side travel through the air faster than the blades on the other side and this tries to tip the helicopter over. (Igor Sikorsky had to invent cyclic pitch to prevent this).
The same thing happens to certain quarks whose rims line up with the rim of the gyroscope, flywheel or bicycle wheels. The speed that these items are turning---in respect to the macrocosm---now adds to portions of the quark rim speed which before was close to the speed of light and now gets even closer to the speed of light (becoming more massive hence at a higher frequency). So you are moving up an asymptotic curve close to that unsurpassable speed of c. And this---even with a miniscule number of quarks involved---gives us this gyroscopic inertia. It does this because the mass of these few quarks increase tremendously as portions of their rim speed approach the speed of light. As Einstein has shown us, mass increases with speed and especially increases when on that asymptotic portion of the curve.
Of available electrons, only the smallest fraction link with others a distance away to transfer light and heat. The same with the spinning quark that causes gyroscopic inertia. All spinning quarks link to cause inertial mass. All these binding linkages are momentary with the electron's oscillations causing a permanent transfer of energy and the various momentary quark bindings causing inertial mass. This could be seen---in gyroscopic inertia---as only a temporary transfer of inertial mass. But if you could increase our surroundings---as will be the case when our Milky Way galaxy finally collides with the Andromeda galaxy---then anyone here on earth will find both inertial mass, gyroscopic inertia and centrifugal force have all become stronger with the more crowded surroundings.
Now let's go to the stars and you will see the same "A" Laws apply there as well and, as you can see, these too will always have to remain in a repelling position with each other.
Close stars, especially close binary stars, will NEVER be spinning so that their closest sides are moving in the same direction at the same frequency.
Recently Perlmutter discovered this acceleration and showed we must have Einstein's cosmological constant---a repulsive force---between all the stars and galaxies.
If you think Perlmutter is wrong then why do we have Einstein's Principle of Equivalence?
Why is the earth's gravity the same as an acceleration?
Present science doesn't answer that but the only possible answer, my friend, is that space-time is being created MORE in the surroundings than it is between you and the earth thereby pushing you toward the earth.
And if gravity can not be discerned from an accelerating contraction (Principle of Equivalence) then that repulsive force in all the surroundings can not be discerned from an accelerating expansion either.
Scientists have been recently wracking their brains to figure out why we have Perlmutter's acceleration because nothing in our present science has even predicted such a thing.
But read those preceding blue sentences again! Now I hope you can finally see that our "A" Laws tell you exactly why we have Einstein's "cosmological constant" not only in the sky but in the microcosm as well. And they tell you why we have gravity too. Your present science doesn't even do this.
The reason these "A" Laws work is that this universe is built on an extraordinarily simple principle via an endless supply of vector wave resonances producing lower frequency spherical standing wave, scalar wave resonances that, in turn, produce space-time by spinning, orbiting and precessing.
A minimum of space (at that particular frequency) is produced between vector waves that are in phase.
This leads, in turn, to production of the most important vector forces between the closest sides of such spinning spherical resonances and in the direction of the axis of each spin. There are also vector forces via orbits and spin and orbital and spin precessions.
This universe equalizes the energy vector force input to vector force output of these scalar wave resonances by balancing them on specific spin and orbital geodesics.
These vector forces, in turn, combine to produce lower frequency, hence lower energy, scalar resonances, which in turn, spin, precess and orbit producing still lower frequency space-time and its related vector forces and this goes on and on: Thus is our universe built from the microcosm to the macrocosm and may continue indefinitely because higher frequency waves would always be producing lower frequency, lower energy scalar wave resonances and they, in turn, would be producing even lower energy, lower frequency resonances.
This seems to be an infinite frequency universe with each spin/orbit frequency having inertial and gyroscopic qualities but yet with each spin/orbit frequency having its own distinct symmetry laws.”
http://www.rbduncan.com/Ampere
Now Ampere’s laws appear to unite all forces to the harmonics of spin and frequency that are in phase attract each other (laws of super resonance) while out of phase harmonics repels (laws of super dissonance).
So, the picture certainly gets more complex regarding just how geometries of electromagnetic fields may cause changes in the overall forces of nature that are modulated from higher dimensional time domains. This higher dimensional interaction makes for greater amounts of information to be compacted into tight strings of extreme frequencies that may enable all sorts of break throughs in FTL technological innovations in the future. Just how time domains interact can be glimpsed in the bizarre experiments by John Hutchison:
Levitation of water:
Cold welds of dissimilar materials
http://www.americanantigravity.com/hutchison.shtml
In conclusion, the explanation by Mel Winfield that the proton reverse spin causes repulsion within gravity field may be accurate in regards to the antiquark becoming the dominant force in maintaining a new field geometry that is out of phase and in dissonance to the relativity of earth’s electromagnetic forces.
UFO technology, Science, or is it Science Fiction?:
” Pulsating electromagnetic shield against incoming missiles, asteroids or even bullets - reverse engineered from extraterrestrial UFOs”
What makes the extraterrestrial UFOs invincible to any incoming projectiles is the shield of electromagnetic waves that surrounds them. It is now being reverse engineered to form advanced shields against incoming missiles, asteroids and comets.
The electromagnetic stealth is created with the application of very high intensity electromagnetic flux or change of intensity with respect to that of the earth. The amount of energy used can produced amplified effects creating an invisible but very effective barrier to incoming projectiles in a trajectory from the space.
What is most astonishing is that the electromagnetic shields used by the extraterrestrial can deflect the incoming projectiles back towards the source. That is the reason why fighter pilots all over the world as well as infantry divisions are instructed not to fire towards an extraterrestrial UFO.
The technology that makes it possible to defect the incoming projectile is fascinating. The pulsating beamed energy creates an envelope of dynamic energy levels that creates an environment similar to a cushion. When a ball or object hits the cushion, it is deflected back. Similarly the incoming projectiles are deflected back.
An interesting theory shows the incoming projectile can be thrown back to the source even if the trajectory is made to change path several times in its path. The spatial geometry of higher dimensions mapped into the physical universe can actually map the trajectory path of the projectile if the time dimension can be moved back. The reverse path then can be mapped to time in the future. This makes it possible to guide the trajectory back to the source with devastating effects.
According to defense scientists involved in reverse engineering technologies from the extraterrestrial UFOs, the incoming projectile can be given a complete one hundred eighty degrees of turning before thrown back into the spatial path it took to come.
Unlike popular belief that electromagnetic shields can fry incoming projectiles, it can only deflect. The deflection becomes deadly once the object is thrown back to the source.
Copyright © 2004-2005, Indiadaily.com. All Rights Reserved.
http://www.indiadaily.com/editorial/3699.asp
Next we will look at the INTALEK PAPERS.
|
|
|
|
cosmicsurfer
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - 31 Aug 2005 : 14:00:52
|
Lorentz Relativity, Light has no speed limit, and phase conjugation of time reversed light waves.
"The telecommunications industry transmits vast quantities of data via fiber optics. Light signals race down the information superhighway at about 186,000 miles per second. But information cannot be processed at this speed, because with current technology light signals cannot be stored, routed or processed without first being transformed into electrical signals, which work much more slowly. If the light signal could be controlled by light, it would be possible to route and process optical data without the costly electrical conversion, opening up the possibility of processing information at the speed of light.
This is exactly what the EPFL team has demonstrated. Using their Stimulated Brillouin Scattering (SBS) method, the group was able to slow a light signal down by a factor of 3.6, creating a sort of temporary "optical memory." They were also able to create extreme conditions in which the light signal travelled faster than 300 million meters a second. And even though this seems to violate all sorts of cherished physical assumptions,......"
Slowing down light is considered to be a critical step in our ability to process information optically. The US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) considers it so important that it has been funnelling millions of dollars into projects such as "Applications of Slow Light in Optical Fibers" and research on all-optical routers. To succeed commercially, a device that slows down light must be able to work across a range of wavelengths, be capable of working at high bit-rates and be reasonably compact and inexpensive."
http://www.physorg.com/news5929.html
Before jumping into researching the Intalek Papers on Mass Fluctuations, whereby "Gravitomagnetic Theory shows that the magnetic field energy produced by a moving electron is equivalent to its’ special relativistic mass fluctuation, and therefore, is shown to couple to gravity. This motion can either have a typical
velocity or a complex (i.e., time-future) velocity. If the velocity is complex, then the special relativistic mass fluctuation
of an electron is NEGATIVE, exhibit an antigravitational effect, and produce a complex (i.e., time-future) magnetic
field (www.intalek.com/Papers/GMF.pdf&w=mass+fluctuations&d=9093D34FFB&icp=1&.intl=us" target="_blank">http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&p=mass+fluctuations&u=www.intalek.com/Papers/GMF.pdf&w=mass+fluctuations&d=9093D34FFB&icp=1&.intl=us);" let's take a look at the phase conjugation of reverse time light waves and the possible implications of such effects with in matter, biological systems, and utilization of time domain energetics in development of advanced technologies.
Even though we live in a forward time Universe where antimatter is sublimated to a secondary role in defining the relativistic processes that maintains the structure of matter and times arrow, it may be that this asymmetric role of antimatter is in itself a phase conjugation mirror of matters structural holographic template whereby phase fluctuations are anchored to a phase conjugation of the moment as the mirror reverse time template of antimatter is being reassembled into forward time template of matter. If we can understand the process of assembly of time and matter, then we will see that it is impossible to have forward time without having reverse time balancing the future motion of all waves. The picture even gets more complicated since this duality of motion with in the nuclei of all matter has a complex geometry that is fed by a duality of fields in motion at faster then light speeds of extremely high frequencies that resonate within this dimension and form the gluon strings that attach to quarks and antiquarks within the nucleons. Could gravity be the result of mass locked synchronizations that form from this modulation of high frequencies with in the nuclei of atoms as they cascade into this dimension creating matter mass attractions and electromagnetic frequencies?
TO BE CONTINUED.....
|
|
|
|
cosmicsurfer
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - 04 Sep 2005 : 14:39:38
|
NATURE OF AN ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE*
We now know something quite unusual about an electromagnetic wave and about a photon. Figure 4a shows how a photon may be represented. Here we find that a photon is a single oscillation of the E-field vector and the H-field vector as shown in the diagram. Since the oscillation is with respect to time, the wave moves along the axis of velocity in the S-frame for. a single wavelength, then repeats itself again and again. The E- or H-oscillation actually represents an orthogonal, rotating etheric or hyperspatial flux about the velocity vector; this spinning (exploding and imploding) flux is coming into the S-frame from outside it (from virtual states) and returning (into virtual states). It is a neutrino flux, as we shall see. In the photon, half a sine-wave cycle represents the fission action that splits the action quantum into canonical pairs, while the second half of the sine-wave cycle represents the fusion of the canonical fragments back into an action quantum. One half-cycle thus represents a positive time operation or creation, while the other half-cycle represents a negative time (fusion) operation. If the complete sine-wave cycle has sufficient amplitude (energy), it can sometimes be broken in half, with the positive time portion revealing the negative field (negative charge) of the E-vector, while the negative time portion reveals a positive field or charge of the E-vector. This is pair production, the creation of an electron and a positron. Each of these fragments has spin one half, while the photon quantum has spin one. Since the positron is a fusion interaction existent, it is an "electron traveling backward in time," just as predicted by Dirac.
In Figure 4b I show that both the E-field vector and the H-field vector are composed of an infinite number of virtual vectors, each of which is composed of an infinite number of even smaller virtual vectors, and so on. This follows from the fact that during any time interval - including the period of a single oscillation of a photon - a photon may be considered to consist of an infinite number of virtual happenings, each consisting of an infinite number of subhappenings, and so on. The photon itself may then be considered to have a direct, nested virtual substructure, and this substructure is directly hyperspatial in nature as well. This structure has not been considered in Maxwell's field equations, which have been formed from gross macroscopic considerations of bare particles and continuous fields. Maxwell's equations (and the normal concept of an electromagnetic wave and single frequency) thus represent only gross envelopes of the actual form and structure of waves and fields. As I have already shown in the main body of this book, one can even photograph the hyperfield structure of a magnetic field using a simple bar magnet and a color TV tube. Further, we will find that this virtual structure of a photon can be altered, "modulated," or changed by simple signal modulations, among other methods. The only requirement is that we learn to regard modulations differently.
In addition, inside each half-cycle of a photon's E-vector, relatively instantaneous fluctuations and "losses" of the vector's magnitude occur. At these "E-field glitches" in the photon, it actually contains only an H-vector. In this case the photon is a neutrino momentarily - or, in other words, it will admit a neutrino through the E-field glitch. The greater the charged field (voltage potential), the greater the number of photons available, thus the greater the number of neutrino interactions within the field. A potential of about 200-300 volts per meter altitude above the earth's surface normally exists in our biosphere. Many neutrinos emitted by the sun and bombarding the earth are absorbed in or interact with this E-potential above the earth; hence underground experiments to measure the neutrino radiation from the sun have detected less neutrinos than expected.
Momentary H-field glitches exist in a similar manner and interact with or admit neutrinos in a similar fashion.
Light can thus conduct neutrinic waves containing bioenergy or eloptic energy, as T.G. Hieronymus discovered. In the first hyperframe (EM field frame), this can be seen to be simply a space charge of electrons conducting a wave disturbance through it, or a piece of ordinary conductive matter conducting an ordinary EM wave.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Actually the electromagnetic field is not the most fundamental field, but is something that is torn out of, or separated from, a more fundamental field: the vector potential, or A-field, well-known in particle physics but usually ignored in EM field theory. E.g., magnetic field is created (and defined) by x A = B. Looking at the cross product, by definition B field is the line integral about a small surface of the A-field flux through that surface. That is precisely what a single coil of wire, with an electrical current flowing through it, does and therefore creates a magnetic field inside. See the second volume of Feynman's three volumes of physics for more on the A-field. The direct use of the A-field is also psychotronic engineering.
http://www.cheniere.org/books/excalibur/nature_of_an_electromagnetic_wav.htm
|
|
|
|
cosmicsurfer
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - 15 Sep 2005 : 15:10:33
|
Research and Preliminary Engineering
Space Vehicle Program
Main Proposal | Appendix | Addenda A-D | Documents Menu
SUBJECT: Research and Preliminary Engineering for Space Vehicle Program
Part I - Propulsion
Part II - Navigational and Flight Control Instruments
Part III - Communication and Remote Control Systems
Part IV - Materials of Construction
SYNOPSIS
This proposal recommends a long-range coordinated program for the research and preliminary engineering leading to the construction of prototype space vehicles.
The proposal stresses the importance of research on gravitation and on the relationships between electrodynamics and gravitation. It calls attention to certain possibilities inherent in such a program of development.
The program would be divided and conducted in steps, as follows:
(a) Preliminary investigations of physical methods,
(b) Engineering development,
(c) Advance design,
(d) Construction of operating prototypes.
SCOPE OF INTEREST
(a) Propulsion
The program anticipates the use of electric methods of propulsion and control, and specifically excludes the consideration of jet or rocket propulsion devices, per se, except as a means for generating the required high electrical potential. Emphasis is placed on studies of the physical relationships between electrodynamics and gravitation leading to the development of methods of electrogravitic propulsion and steering control.
(b) Navigational and Flight Control Instruments
Problems of space navigation are to be examined, particularly with the view of applying electrogravitic principles in the design of flight instruments to indicate:
1. Gravitational Vector (insensitive to acceleration),
2. Acceleration (insensitive to gravity),
3. Gravitational Gradient (insensitive to acceleration),
4. Gravitational Potential of Space,
5. Electrical Potential of Space,
6. Space Speed (absolute ether drift).
(c) Communication and Remote Control Systems
Applications of electrogravitic induction to communications and remote control are to be developed. Use of gravitational radiation is the objective.
Basic tests with electrically-shielded capacitors and massive high-K dielectrics are proposed. Methods are to extended into full-scale communication systems. Such systems, while similar to electromagnetic (radio) systems may be found to offer many advantages - such as higher penetrability, elimination, elimination of "shaded" areas, higher velocity of wave propagation and a wholly new spectrum of channels.
(d) Materials of Construction
Continuation of the research of the late Charles Francis Brush on the "non-equivalence of mass and weight" is recommended (see appendix). Further confirmation of the Brush findings may be provided by the existence of gravitational isotopes, as distinguished from mass isotopes. Procedures for isolating gravitational isotopes in common aircraft metals, with the object of creating super-light alloys.
Methods of beneficiation are suggested for enriching the content of lighter gravitational isotopes in common aircraft metals, with the object of creating super-light alloys. The spontaneous evolution of heat, observed by Brush and Harrington, appears to be one of the characteristics of lighter gravitational isotopes, and may serve as a tracer in the steps of beneficiation. Studies are proposed to determine the source of the energy and to investigate possible uses of said heat.
This program is to include a study of the rare earth metals and their alloys, and also the metal tantalum, regarded as potential aircraft materials. In nature, most of the rare earth metals (and tantalum) indicate mean values of specific gravity having large negative anomalies, and this property makes them interesting as probable rich sources of gravitational isotopes required in the manufacture of super-light materials of construction.
PROGRAM OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Group A - ELECTRODYNAMIC-GRAVITATIONAL FIELD RELATIONSHIPS
Purpose: Generation of quasi-gravitation by electrical means, quantitative measurements and derivation of equations.
Abstract:
One of the basic relationships between the electrodynamic field and the gravitational field appears to be revealed "during the process of charging or discharging electric capacitors".
Proposal:
Confirming experiments are proposed in which two or more large high-voltage capacitors are associated spatially with a short-period geophysical gravimeter. Careful observations are to be made of the momentary gravitational anomalies induced in the region which accompany the change in electrical state. Studies are proposed of the effects of varying total capacitance, rate-of-change of electric charge, mass of dielectric materials, specific inductive capacity of said materials and whether the effects are vector or scalar. These investigations shall be directed toward the derivation of a satisfactory mathematical expression including all of the above factors.
Group B - PROPAGATION OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVES
Purpose: Transmission and reception of electro-gravitational waves for purposes of communication and remote control.
Abstracts:
Preliminary experiments have indicated the existence of an inductive inter-action between two independent shielded capacitors. In these experiments, a discharging capacitor induces a voltage in an adjacent capacitor, and the effect appears to penetrate electromagnetic shielding. Theoretically, this effect of one capacitor upon another appears to be electrogravitic in nature and constitutes evidence of a new type of wave propagation. It is believed that this form of inductive transmission may eventually be utilized in a completely new method of wireless communication.
Proposal:
It is proposed that progressively larger-scale and longer-range transmissions be conducted. Beginning with untuned systems, laboratory tests are proposed to explore the basic electrogravitic relationships between simple systems of capacitors. Then, progressing to tuned systems, and pulsed (radar) applications, large-scale out-of-door demonstrations are suggested. Such demonstrations shall be conducted between suitably protected transmitting and receiving vaults (preferably underground) which are thoroughly shielded against electromagnetic radiation. Appropriate studies of wave attenuation due to transmission through large masses of earth may then be undertaken. Similar studies of wave attenuation in sea water are also prosed. These studies are to be supported by fundamental research on the nature of electrogravitic induction (See appendix for outline).
Group C - PONDEROMOTIVE FORCES IN SOLID DIELECTRICS
Purpose: Isolation and measurement of electrogravitic forces in solid dielectrics.
Abstract:
Investigations conducted by Biefeld and Brown point to the existence of a hitherto unrecognized ponderomotive force in all ferroelectrics under changing electric stress. This force appears to be a function of the specific inductive capacitance and the mass of the dielectric material, as well as high voltage and current factors. Recent availability of the massive barium titanate (high-K) dielectrics and other dielectrics of this class give promise of developing these forces to the point where they may become of practical importance in specific propulsion applications.
Proposal:
A survey of dielectric materials revealing this effect is proposed. Beginning with a critical analysis, using the Townsend Brown Differential Electrometer (an instrument developed at the Naval Research Laboratory and at the University of Pennsylvania), studies are proposed of the forces developed in mica, glass, marble, phenolics and dielectrics in general and then, in particular, the newer ceramic dielectrics. This work is to be augmented by basic determinations of the Biefeld-Brown effect in vacuum. (See appendix).
It is proposed that, after suitably active materials are selected, scale models of other rotary and linear "motors" be constructed and tested. With the necessary engineering data then at hand, a motor to weigh approximately 500 lbs. may be constructed to propel a model ship. This is proposed as a practical demonstration of one of the forms of electrogravitic drive.
Ether drift and space-couple observations, including specifically a repetition of the classic Trouton-Noble experiment (but using massive dielectrics) are suggested as being of interest not only for their contribution to basic knowledge of the nature of space but as bearing upon the principle of operation of space speed indicators (See appendix).
Low temperature experiments in physics of the solid state (using the liquid-helium cryostat) are highly recommended but are expensive. These experiments, however, may be so designed as to provide answers to many questions relative to the fundamental nature of gravitation. They are to embrace such subjects as the "Anomalous Mass of the Electron in Metals" and the "Behavior of Super-Cooled Dielectrics".
The availability of the liquid-helium cryostat would enable the project to engage continuously in low-temperature work which could contribute enormously to our knowledge of solid state physics.
Group D - REACTIVE FORCES IN FLUID DIELECTRICS
Purpose: Development of high speed electrokinetic propulsive systems for spacecraft.
Abstract:
Studies of boundary forces (where electrodes are in contact with fluid dielectrics) reveal the existence of a "complex" of inter-acting forces, some of which are purely electrostatic, some electromagnetic and some which could be electrogravitic. The tentative theory requires these electrogravitic forces to be present whenever a mass of dielectric material is charged and moving, and to increase in proportion to the volume of the fluid which is charged and moved. Hence, it is, in a sense, the juxtaposition of the elements of the static form of the capacitor described in Group C experiments, and provides what may be described as an electrokinetic propulsive system, with direct applications to high speed aircraft and spacecraft.
Proposal:
It is proposed that electrically-charged circular airfoils be mathematically analyzed and improved. Starting with 2 ft. discs at 50 KV, the steps of the development should include 4 ft. discs at 150 KV and a 10 ft. disc at 500 KV. Careful measurements are to be made of both static and dynamic thrust. Studies are also proposed wherein the discs are adapted for vertical lift (levitation) as well as for horizontal thrust and this feature may be incorporated in the design of the 10 ft. experimental model.
It is proposed that studies likewise be made of various methods for obtaining the required high voltages, and these studies should include the development and evaluation of the capacitor voltage multiplier and the "flame-jet" electrostatic generator to provide up to 15 million volts (See appendix).
This work is to be augmented by the engineering studies on the relative efficiency of propulsion of electrified discs in air at reduced pressure or in vacuum and at various voltages.
Group E - "THE SPONTANEOUS GENERATION OF HEAT IN CERTAIN COMPLEX SILICATES, LAVAS AND CLAYS.
Purpose: To establish the existence of the positive effects observed by Brush and Harrington, determine the origin of the energy represented and extend the observations into the rare earth /and other/ elements.
Abstract:
The discovery by Charles Francis Brush of an unexplained heating effect in certain materials is strikingly reminiscent of the discovery of radioactivity by Henri Becquerel which led to the isolation of radium by the Curies. Recent studies have indicated a certain parallelism between the radioactive elements and the rare earth elements, revealing the possibility of a spontaneous release of energy (in this instance in the form of heat alone) by the rare earth elements.
Thus, the newly discovered "thermoactivity" may bear the same relationship with the rare earth elements as "radioactivity" bears with the radioactive elements. In all probability the source of the energy represented in thermoactivity will be found in the complex unstable electronic shells of the rare earth atoms, and not in the nuclei as in radioactivity.
The anomalous gravitational properties of the rare earth elements and their wide-spread but tenuous occurrence in nature point to other parallels with the radioactive elements such as decay of activity and critical limits of mass.
Proposal:
1. Conduct an organized examination of materials (complex silicates, lavas, and clays) known to exhibit spontaneous heating.
2. Conduct a field search for additional materials.
3. Attempt to isolate and purify materials showing spontaneous heating.
4. Extend the examinations into the rare earth metals and tantalum.
5. Conduct mathematical and theoretical studies of gravitational isotopes as distinguished from mass isotopes.
6. Study the mechanism of spontaneous heat generation and the decay of the effect.
7. Study the effects of ionization, electric and magnetic fields upon the effect.
8. Study methods of beneficiation of materials for intensification of the heating effect.
Group F - NAVIGATIONAL AND FLIGHT CONTROL INSTRUMENTS
1. Gravitational Vector (stable vertical)
2. Accelerometer (inertial gradient)
3. Gravitational Gradient (gravity)
Purpose: Engineering development and design, adaptation for operation in conjunction with servo mechanisms for actuating flight control devices.
Abstract:
The physical principles underlying the operation of these instruments have evolved from the findings of C. F. Brush (see appendix - references). Quite recently, careful studies of the records of the Brush experiments have been made. The conclusions, while still highly controversial, leave no doubt that the Brush concept, if supported, can provide answers to many difficult and, as yet unsolved, problems in navigational and flight control instrumentation.
The Brush findings may be expressed simply:
"the ratio of mass to weight is not the same for all kinds of matter, as has been supposed, and the mass-weight ratio is not constant even in the same kind of matter".
Based on the hypothesis of the non-equivalence of mass and weight, the principles of three instruments have evolved as follows:
1. Gravitational vector (stable vertical)
Two equal (inertial) masses of unequal weight are utilized in a balanced pivoted device. Such a device may be said to be inertially symmetrical and gravitationally asymmetrical. The pivoted system will orient itself to the vector of gravity and yet remain insensitive to the inertial effects of acceleration and centrifugal force.
2. Accelerometer (inertial gradient)
Two unequal (inertial) masses of equal weight disposed in a pivoted device as above, but with spiral spring (or the like) tending to restore the movable system to zero position. The pivoted element responds quantitatively to inertial effects of acceleration and centrifugal force but is insensitive to gravity.
3. Gravitational Gradient (gravity)
Such an instrument is the reverse of the accelerometer above and structurally resembles the gravitational vector indicator except that it includes a spring which is adjusted to restore the indication to zero in the absence of a gravitational field. The movable element responds quantitatively to gravity (g) only and is completely insensitive to all inertial effects such as acceleration or centrifugal force.
Proposal:
It is proposed that operating models of the three types of instruments be constructed and tested on a centrifugal carriage. Materials for the dipoles of the pivoted systems are to be selected from benificiated gravitational isotopes (both light and heavy) developed under Group E. These prototype instruments are to be adaptable for operation in conjunction with telemetric circuits or servo mechanisms for actuating flight control devices.
Graphic - Space Program Proposal Flow Chart: Thumb (5.7 Kb) Full (111.3 Kb)
IMPLEMENTATION
(a) Laboraory facilities
To be supplied directly by the parent company or its subsidiaries.
(b) Personnel
Members of the regular research and engineering staff of the parent company and its subsidiaries, with services of such technical or operational consultants as may be necessary.
(c) Sub-contracts
To be awarded only when it is impractical or uneconomical to perform the work with company facilities.
CONDENSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST
1955 - October through December (3 months only)
Organizational work and planning ($ 3,000.00)
Establishment of technical reference library on gravitation and allied subjects ($ 5,000.00)
Preliminary beneficiation of gravitational isotopes ($ 12,500.00)
Engineering design of flight control instruments ($ 12,500.00)
Quantitative tests of Biefeld_Brown effects in solid dielectrics ($ 9,500.00)
Basic tests on propagation of gravitational waves for communication purposes ($15,000.00)
Total ($ 57,500.00)
1956 - 1958 (3 years)
Detailed schedule and expenditures to be determined during the preliminary organizational and planning stage.
Respectfully submitted.
T. Townsend Brown
Consultant
Washington D. C.
December 1, 1955
http://soteria.com/brown/docs/egravity/space.htm
I watched again last night the "UFO's, Seeing is believing" by Peter Jennings on the National Geographic Channel. Well, they would end with a big bang theorist Professor Michio Kaku at least admitting that just maybe there were civilizations that were millions of years more advanced then ours in the universe. But, I have to laugh at SETI, since if these advanced civilizations do indeed exist then why does SETI even think they are going to find evidence in the radio spectrum at light speeds when the very existance of aliens around our planet would require capabilities to
travel faster then light in order to traverse the vast distances to arrive at our planet in the first place. Maybe SETI needs to read some of the Townsend Brown documents: "In these experiments, a discharging capacitor induces a voltage in an adjacent capacitor, and the effect appears to penetrate electromagnetic shielding. Theoretically, this effect of one capacitor upon another appears to be electrogravitic in nature and constitutes evidence of a new type of wave propagation. It is believed that this form of inductive transmission may eventually be utilized in a completely new method of wireless communication."
(cited from above document)
NEW BOOK ON TOWNSEND BROWN IN THE WORKS:
Defying Gravity: The Parallel Universe of T. Townsend Brown
“The Universe is full of magical things,
patiently waiting
for your wits to grow sharper.”
--Eden Philpotts*
Defying Gravity is a biographical mystery that ponders the question “how come nobody has ever heard of T. Townsend Brown?”
Townsend Brown was a celebrated prodigy of electrical science during the 1920s, was respected as an innovative physicist throughout the mid-century, and is generally regarded as the seminal pioneer in the field of anti-gravity research and technology. So how is it that the trail of Brown’s life and work is almost impossible to trace? Why is it that every lead seems to trail off down some dark corridor of intrigue or run into a brick wall of officially “classified” material?
Townsend Brown was a teenager when he discovered a theoretical link between electricity and gravity. The concept he pioneered is, ironically, now embodied in a common household appliance that is advertised on television every day. The same principal is also secretly deployed in some of America’s most sophisticated combat aircraft.
So why is this man's life such a complete mystery?
Born in 1905 to a prominent Midwest family, Thomas Townsend Brown was expected to take the reins of the family’s diverse business interests. Like so many of his now-revered predecessors, he chose instead to explore the mysteries of a much larger universe.
Expanding on his original discoveries through more than four decades, Brown built numerous wingless devices that flew without any conventional means of propulsion – the precursors to a future generation of gravity-defying “electric spacecraft.”
As his unique insight and skills opened doors that are not typically available to lesser mortals, Brown’s career traversed the narrow path between science and science fiction. Along the way, he encountered the sort of obstacles that confront any original thinker who dares to challenge the orthodoxy of conventional wisdom.
His singular abilities also drew Brown into a shadow world of secret forces that operate simultaneously within and apart from the world's sovereign political powers. Defying Gravity will reveal how Brown’s inventions achieved contact with “dimensions out of our space,” a concept just now earning favor among the most advanced cosmological theories.
By focusing on the intimate details of Brown's life — and the impact such a life can have on the lives of those closest to him — Defying Gravity should appeal to all readers of history and biography. Written by science historian Paul Schatzkin (author of The Boy Who Invented Television), Defying Gravity will portray the gracious and resolute way Brown faced the obstacles that challenged him, shed light on the way some truly groundbreaking discoveries get absorbed into the "black world" of classified military research, and in the process encounter some of the ancient puzzles of life on this planet.
Among the mysteries that will be expored in
Defying Gravity
The Parallel Universe of T. Townsend Brown:
Was Townsend Brown a CIA operative? What were his connections to America's National Security apparatus?
What was he doing in Germany at the end of WW II?
Why was the FBI keeping a file on him in the 1950s?
Where did he go during his frequent disappearances from his family?
Why did he stash his family in Hawaii as the Cold War began?
What was the true extent of his involvement with the notorious “Philadelphia Experiment” ?
Where did all the family money go? Was that the cause of the estrangement from his only son?
Did the government suppress Brown’s anti-gravity research?
Or is his electric-propulsion work secretly in use today?
http://ttbrown.com/onesheet.html
John |
|
|
|
cosmicsurfer
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - 21 Sep 2005 : 13:20:32
|
IS IT "ABOUT TIME" FOR A NEW LAB FOR JOHN HUTCHISON? Harold Berndt
along with Tim Ventura from American Antigravity visit John Hutchison. Here is his article:
"The Effect of John Hutchison
An Experiential Overview
It was Friday September 9th, 2005. I was sitting in a wonderfully eclectic Coffee House/Cabaret in Mt. Shasta California after participating in my very first (and incredible) CSETI training with Dr. Steven Greer (The Disclosure Project, CSETI, SEAS Power). I was attending to my E-Mail and enjoying the local fare and I was also preparing to hit the road while anticipating my 10 hour drive back to my little area of Canada in Surrey, BC. Just as I was about to pack up my laptop, a message appeared which caught my attention. It was from Tim Ventura (American Antigravity), Mike Shafer, a Cornell graduate & Microsoft manager and Colby Harper, an IT Professional & STAIF-contributor… all being alt-science enthusiast, as they were planning a road trip up to New Westminster where the object of their “obsession” resided. I quickly replied to let everyone know I was State-side and that I would most likely be passing right by them as they headed out from Seattle the next morning. So, as I was most suited to act as the group tour guide (which I was thrilled to assume), arrangements were made to meet up the next day and continue the trip to New West.
And so the pilgrimage began…
After a few complications in our meeting arrangements in Blaine Washington… we finally got together and crossed the border and were on our way. We arrived in New West about an hour or two late, but none the less, we were greeted by a most welcoming host. I hate those first few awkward moments during new meetings when everyone is analyzing the situation and simply trying to not look out of place… but this was a very short lived phenomenon during this meeting. It might sound corny, and I believe my associates would qualify this, but to this observer, it was very clear right from the beginning that an atmosphere of cooperation and openness was present. I wasn’t sure what to expect, after all, I was meeting someone who seemed to have the power of an incredibly advanced technology within the palms of his hands… and… who knows of anyone else who has the proven ability to levitate a 75 lbs Cannon Ball in mid air?... OR… who simply has … and in absolute reality… the ability to melded two elements together with the flick of a switch (actually, many switches)!
...And, as such, I was become the Genius of John Hutchison!
As I examined his environment, his personality, his ability to make everyone feel that they were on the same level, I soon realized I was in the presence of a very enlightened human being. I do not mean to espouse Sainthood on John, or anything like it, however, there was a distinct feeling of humbleness from this man who could literally have the world in the palms of his hands.
...And, as such, I found myself reflecting on the Humility of John Hutchison…
After spending some time in conversation, discussing how we could actually help change the world for the better and a few ideas of how to actually “do it”… we headed up to see the veritable “proof in the pudding” as it were! There we found ourselves, outside the door of the famous “LAB”… where the very existence of specific alternative/exotic and even “ETS” (extraterrestrial spacecraft) technologies existed… including the letters and documents from various Government types like the Pentagon, Washington, the White House, various Aerospace concerns, Boeing, NASA and the list goes on… WOW… what a trip!
I soon discovered that part of John’s work “must” involve “miniaturization technology” for it was literally close to impossible to move within his lab. Out of the 700 Square feet of apartment space, I estimate that 85-90% has been taken up with the shear volume of John’s lab equipment.
Now, unlike most of my associates, I knew John was under heavy pressure NOT to “spark” up any of his gear. After all, if you lived a few doors from John when he was actively experimenting, you could expect things like various household articles either flipping off your counter or worse/(better), you may find yourself levitating in your living room with no readily available explanation! So, the “cease and desist” order came rather quickly. Then there was the movement to have John removed from the building and the City. All it took to reverse this travesty of justice, was the mention of John’s plight on a very well known late night radio show… and Badda Bing… the letters of support started “gravitating” in. And when the municipal “powers that be” realized exactly who and what they had within the city borders of New Westminster… it must have been quite a scene watching these various dignitaries “back-peddling” on their Shwinn’s along with their apology to John!
So, as we examined “The Lab”, I was struck by the simplicity of John’s existence. Conventional equipment like a toilet, appeared as an afterthought surrounded by wall to wall electronic, physics and other gear. It was obvious to the writer, exactly what was… and is… important to John Hutchison.
Tim Ventura was busy recording every precious moment as John, Colby, Mike, Bryan and myself where crammed into what appeared to be the kitchen! And to lighten the potential for the occasional claustrophobic episode, Mike Shafer came up with a great quote from the movie Apollo 13…
“As you can see... the Lunar module (AKA - John’s Lab) is
really no bigger than the size a couple of telephone booths…”!
It was a timely & classic quote and one that I hope was captured properly on video.
As Tim’s interview came to a close, and as we were not allowed to see the actual “effect” in action, we quickly turned our attention to the “hard” evidence… The actual metal samples that have been subjected to the “Hutchison Effect”.
John quite humbly presented these pieces that have undergone what could quite possibly be, something that no other element that we know of has experienced.
To see these pieces of metal in their modified form was quite an experience and one I will never forget. For when you see the evidence first hand, and to understand that our current model of physics and technology, just might be (sadly) lacking as far as the “updated text” is concerned… well… this was quite sobering… given the world’s current state of affairs.
...And as such, I was taken aback by the potential & power of John Hutchison…
But just how would someone like me go about helping release the shackles place on Hutchison and others like him? I had an idea that has slowly been evolving and I thought it might be as good a time as any to spring it. You see, as a young man growing up in the testosterone induced, horsepower environment of the 70’s, I was constantly challenged by the need to tweak that extra 10 or 20 horse power out of my muscle cars.. Arrr Arrr Arrr! But my environment did dictate how successful or active I was in this regard as I was quite often without a suitable place to do this work. Then came, my “Dream Garage”, (in other words, my “Lab”), when an enterprising company opened a “rent-a-bay” auto garage where you could rent a warm, covered spot to do a simple tune-up or a complete overhaul and I was thrilled. They had an on site mechanic if you needed assistance (for a fee) and they also had a parts department if you forgot to pick up the odd gasket or set of plugs etc… it was “gear heaven” if you know what I mean!
Fast forward to 2005 and here I am relating this adolescent experience with John Hutchison! Growing up myself in Vancouver, BC, John and I had many of the same stories to tell of hanging out at “Little Mountain” (AKA Queen Elizabeth Park), English bay, the North Shore etc… etc… So, with our rapport building, I explained how, similar to the rent-a-bay garage idea, I had envisioned a type of place using the garage as a template but with a fully functional, cooperative-open source science and physics Lab! I went on to describe a place where bright enterprising inventors, physicists and general tinkerers could come and put their theories to the test. I belong to a number of news groups and the general problem facing these “on the edge” inventors is that they simply have no place to do the work… properly. Most will share their plans, diagrams and advice for building these “world changing” technologies but a proper working model was just not forthcoming. And being extremely aware of John Hutchison’s current “static” environment… I asked him if something like this would interest him. The response was one, not un-like what a fish might say if you offered to place him back in the water after landing him in your boat... (that is, if the fish could talk)! I knew I was on to something...
...And as such, I was struck by the open and forward thinking of John Hutchison…
The “Effect” of John Hutchison… as it were.
This is only the beginning. As I learn more and meet different people within this new world I’ve found myself, I pray that one day soon I will actually realize this evolving dream. That before we can say “$10.00 per gallon”… alternative technologies will be found and we can start to turn the tide on this fossil-fuel folly and other madness we find ourselves living with… on our home… planet Earth! I’m hoping to follow this article with updates, news and new ideas on advancing technologies and perhaps… a new and cooperative Lab to help advance them. Stay Tuned!"
http://www.americanantigravity.com/articles/218/1/The-Effect-of-John-Hutchison
Here is a video of the Hutchison Effect from American Antigravity website:
http://www.americanantigravity.com/video/Hutchison-Heavy-Mix.wmv
John
|
|
|
|
Dangus
USA
132 Posts |
Posted - 29 Sep 2005 : 03:44:18
|
The supposed NAZI flying saucers are a hoax in my opinion. If Germany had technology of that level it could have been used to stop high-altitude bombers even with no gun whatsoever mounted on it. They could have simply levitated above the bombers and dropped bombs on them filled with shrapnel, or used some other means to employ them in a devastating manner. I don't think Germany had even the beginnings of such a program. I've studied German weapons a fair amount and have never seen any evidence of such a facility, or technological background to make such a concept happen. The Germans were too busy trying to get a nuclear bomb to bother building flying saucers.
"Regret can only change the future" -Me |
|
|
|
cosmicsurfer
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - 29 Sep 2005 : 06:31:17
|
| I watched a documentary film that was produced by the Knights Templars that included extensive research materials, photos, testimonials and actual footage of test flights of German saucers (rare film). Also Townsend Brown worked on US antigravity experiments, and may have been sent over to Germany at the end of the war. If the pictures and film of saucers in flight are real, and the NAZI's did have the technology then no doubt the rush was on by US and Russians to capture what was left of the research, scientists, and technology at the end of the war. |
|
|
|
Dangus
USA
132 Posts |
Posted - 30 Sep 2005 : 00:05:30
|
If you're going to cite the "Knights Templar" as a source of credible evidence, I'm not sure there's much I can do to help this discussion.
If we had anti-gravity, we'd be using it. Not even the government, and perhaps ESPECIALLY not the government, could keep that sort of thing secret. We can't even hide our nuclear secrets from the Chinese! Besides, anti-grav would be useless if the private sector didn't put a lot of R&D into it. The government is simply incapable of keeping up with current tech on it's own. We can't even handle a hurricane well.
"Regret can only change the future" -Me |
|
|
|
cosmicsurfer
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - 01 Oct 2005 : 07:45:36
|
You have the right to disagree with anything that you read on this message board. However, I disagree with your generalized statements and I think you are totally wrong about national security priorities and DOD secrets. But, I will partially agree with you in regard to FEMA having a difficult time coordinating hurricane relief efforts with the local government that was totally inept in not forcing a complete evacuation given that they were warned about the severity of Katrina and the breaching of the dikes....
I in fact did see an awesome archival film of documents, pictures of craft, and actual test flights that were held in secret for many years by free masons that were involved with the research, engineering and production of german antigravity technologies that were initially developed back in the 1920's. If you had actually researched the history of Antigravity rather then just making blanket negative comments, then you would also know that antigravity research was also initiated in the United States back in the 1920's. This is prior to WWII, and in fact before the subject was locked down under existing strict security controls it was publicly discussed and researched by a long list of major DOD contractors prior to 1952. I will post some documents later that pertain to the early gravitic government research papers prior to the lock down, but first I want to get back to current public non DOD research including the Intalek Papers once I get more time. If you want to discuss this subject then please do some cursury homework, read the posts here and see the video's.
|
|
|
|
Dangus
USA
132 Posts |
Posted - 02 Oct 2005 : 16:46:13
|
One entire side of my family is buried in the Masonic Garden in Des Moines. I'm pretty familiar with the group ;)
I've done a lot more research into this than you give me credit for. I just believe that a lot of the "footage" is a fabrication, and quite a lot of it isn't what people think it is. German research into helicopters, hovercraft, and hovering via jets is well known, and much of the supposed NAZI flying saucer footage merely shows examples of that very research. They aren't big secrets. No government on Earth is capable of keeping a secret that huge, unless of course their anti-gravity technology is so incredibly inefficient that anyone who's seen it doesn't want it. That's about the only condition I could think of where it could be kept secret, if it was useless.
"Regret can only change the future" -Me |
|
|
|
cosmicsurfer
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - 03 Oct 2005 : 14:54:44
|
There are no exhaust pipes for propulsion exiting under the smooth surface of any of the german craft (posted pictures-no exhaust vents or jet air disturbances) that I saw in motion or on the extensive engineering plans that I looked at, nor can helicopters or jets move at right angles quickly and remain perfectly still in the atmosphere.
For the last year and a half I have been building my dream home overlooking a prime surf spot here on the big island of Hawaii, finally my dad and mom have just flown over to see our new house. Growing up around the defense industry, I use to as a child spend time out in Palmdale around a pool while my father worked on top secret military projects at Edwards Air Force Base. While in the military I processed security clearances for the Human Reliability Program for Nuclear Weapons. If you wandered into a secured military facility that has posted signs "Authorized Personnel Only," or "... Use of Deadly Force" and did not stop upon being approached by a security team you would be shot dead. Only a fool would think that "black projects" are public knowledge, when in fact these projects may take up to 30 years of development and you will not hear about it because the project may be classified "Top Secret" for another 50 years. If you read the existing defense industry documents that were allowed to be published prior to 1952, you will note that every major government contractor was working on antigravity. Only a very few documents after that period are available such as the Townsend Brown Antigravity Space Vehicle proposal (posted above). Prior to that time period the projects were still classified, but there was an open discussion regarding UFO's and antigravity at corporate levels. A great documentary called "Are UFO's Real?" was produced by a former Air Force information officer that showed actual black and white footage of antigravity craft defying normal flight capabilities. Also, 1952 was the year that the capital of the US was buzzed by a fleet of UFO's which may have been the final event that pushed the complete lock down on the subject in which all discussion by corporations was now off limits to the public.
Now back to rediscovering the primary principles of levitation which may redefine how gravity works as was exhibited by prior experimentation from T. Townsend Brown, J.R. Searl, and John Hutchison.
|
|
|
|
cosmicsurfer
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - 03 Oct 2005 : 16:30:49
|
Now we will finally take a look at the Intalek Papers. This watershed re-discovery by William Alek, of Intalek Corporation of "Negative Energy" that Tesla called "Radiant Energy" redefines the geometries associated with electromagnetic waveforms and gravitational interactions, creates a cold (reverse time) electrical energy state. Here is a synopsis of his discovery:
"Negative Energy is observed as a transformation of ambient thermal environmental energy to "time-reversed" electrical energy. This form of electrical energy is theorized as an electromagnetic flow of "time-reversed" displacement current that is "converged" onto electrons. This results in a "backward" or "reverse" drift flow of electrons, or what is known as "cold current". Both common current (hot current) and cold current can flow down a copper conductor simultaneously.
However, if cold current dominates the flow through a resistor for example, a "cooling" effect is observed in that resistor. The cooling effect is regarded as "negentropic" and theorized as "self-ordering" of the quantum active vacuum, which has been proven to
occur for a short period of time.
The phenomena was first observed by Nikola Tesla back in the 1880's. Tesla then devised a series of machines patented in the 1890's that greatly amplify this phenomena, which he later called RADIANT ENERGY.
INTALEK, INC. has discovered that an impulse of NEGATIVE ENERGY is released back to the source (dipole) supply from a set of mutually coupled primary/secondary coils configured as an ordinary
transformer. The "negative" mutual coupling component is established through ferromagnetic media. The secondary coil MUST have reverse residual magnetization and sufficient inductance in
order for the phenomena to occur.
INTALEK, INC. has found a way to build practical solid-state electronic products based on this discovery."
www.intalek.com/Index/BusinessPlan/Plan01b.pdf&w=intalek&d=VZpYXWFULd1e&icp=1&.intl=us" target="_blank">http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=INTALEK&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fl=0&u=www.intalek.com/Index/BusinessPlan/Plan01b.pdf&w=intalek&d=VZpYXWFULd1e&icp=1&.intl=us
Here is Bill's post at ZPEnergy:
"I show how the mass of an object undergoes a state transition from its kinetic state to gravimetric state, back to its kinetic state. The kinetic state is considered Newtonian and therefore, subject to inertia. On the other hand, the gravimetric state is considered non-Newtonian and therefore, inertialess.
A correlation is established between a fluctuating mass, a fluctuating inductance, and a fluctuating capacitance, thereby unifying the gravitational force with the electromagnetic forces. If fluctuation should cease, the object resorts back to its original kinetic state.
The paper also shows how the gravimetric state may be used to extract electrical FREE ENERGY. Spacetime media is modeled as an aetheric gas, or exerts a graviton pressure. Simply by compressing or rarefying the spacetime media, directly affects electromagnetic energy. A "gravimetric amplifier" could be built that adroitly collects this excess electrical energy. A consequence of this action results in a variance of the local time stream with an active radius that conforms to the inverse square law. An instantaneous change in motion of the "amplifier" will also be experienced.
A fascinating correlation is also established between the gravimetric state of matter and the common photon. A photon can be modeled as a fluctuating mass that exerts a force, must travel at a constant velocity, and is entirely inertialess. Its direction of motion is only affected by gravity because it contains a property of mass.
A brief summary of my theory is shown here:
http://intalek.com/Index/Index.htm
Inductive and capacitive MathCAD simulations are shown here:
http://www.intalek.com/Papers/GIMFsim01.pdf
http://www.intalek.com/Papers/GCMFsim01.pdf
Finally, a theory that’s simple, stunningly exquisite, and testable.
Bill
---------------------
Dear Bill,
Thanks for the sending of your paper, this seems interesting, but where I can find a simple PROOF OF CONCEPT EXPERIMENT about your Gravimetric Mass Fluctuation theory that ANYONE can perform and REPLICATE INDEPENDANTLY?
I shall be glad to conduct myself a such experiment... Don't forget that a claim is valid ONLY with some full and independent replications by independent researchers worldwide...
Best Regards
Jean-Louis Naudin
Email: JNaudin...@aol.com
Main Web site : http://www.jlnlabs.org
---------
Jean-Louis,
The theory I presented, no doubt, makes some rather extraordinary "predictions". The issue is devising experiments to test the theory, which I'm in the process of doing.
Stay tuned! There's more to come.
Bill"
www.zpenergy.com/modules.php%3Fname%3DNews%26file%3Darticle%26sid%3D504&w=intalek+papers&d=QRPP_WFULfgy&icp=1&.intl=us" target="_blank">http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=intalek+papers&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fl=0&u=www.zpenergy.com/modules.php%3Fname%3DNews%26file%3Darticle%26sid%3D504&w=intalek+papers&d=QRPP_WFULfgy&icp=1&.intl=us
"Hello all,
I just uploaded my latest and greatest major new release 3.0 of my GMF paper:
http://www.intalek.com/Papers/GMF.pdf
It's 100 pages of NEW physics. The main subject of this paper is the discovery of gravitational mass, and how its related to an inertial mass. As you know, an inertial mass diverges to infinity as a vehicle approaches the speed of light, however, this is NOT the case with a gravitational mass. The speed of a gravitational mass is ONLY limited by a rate at which its mass is changing, and converges to a minimum mass at distance infinity. Therefore, controlling this mass of the vehicle controls its position within a given gravity well. The rate of speed of this vehicle could easily exceed the speed of light without inertial reactive effects because its moving gravitationally, not inertially. Since the speed of the vehicle could exceed far beyond the speed of light, Warp Factor calculations are required and example calculations are shown in this paper.
To prove my gravity theory is correct, example 5 using GPS global positioning satellites on page 40 shows the "pinpoint" accuracy of my calculations. Observe the effect of gravitational BLUE SHIFT and special relativistic RED SHIFT has on electromagnetic radio waves coming from a satellite over 20 x 10^3 km in orbit above the Earth. The "exactness" and high precision of these calculations are revealed.
In the coming weeks, I'll explain more of the incredible detail presented in my paper as I consider the REAL possibility of NOT only traveling to other star systems, but finding the "onramp" to the galactic "superhighway"! I have a feeling the traffic is --- heavy.
A brief summary of the paper is presented here:
http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/GMF/GMF.htm
So, stay tuned, strap yourself in, there's much more to come...
Bill
---
William S. Alek
FREE ENERGY and Antigravitational Technologies
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/intalek"
http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=intalek+papers&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fl=0&u=pesn.com/2005/03/21/6900070_Gravitational_Mass_Fluctuations_Paper&w=intalek+papers&d=EY368GFULf6h&icp=1&.intl=us
How does time really work? Can we travel faster then light? Here are some quotes from my previous posts that question existing physics and provide possible new directions in understanding a dual time domain:
"Even though we live in a forward time Universe where antimatter is sublimated to a secondary role in defining the relativistic processes that maintains the structure of matter and times arrow, it may be that this asymmetric role of antimatter (in our half of universe) is in itself a phase conjugation mirror of matters structural holographic template whereby phase fluctuations are anchored to a phase conjugation of the moment as the mirror reverse time template of antimatter is being reassembled into forward time template of matter. If we can understand the process of assembly of time and matter, then we will see that it is impossible to have forward time without having reverse time balancing the future motion of all waves. The picture even gets more complicated since this duality of motion with in the nuclei of all matter has a complex geometry that is fed by a duality of fields in motion at faster then light speeds (GRAVITONS AND ANTIGRAVITONS?) of extremely high frequencies that resonate within this dimension and form the gluon strings that attach to quarks and antiquarks within the nucleons. Could gravity be the result of mass locked synchronizations that form from this modulation of high frequencies with in the nuclei of atoms as they cascade into this dimension creating matter mass attractions and electromagnetic frequencies?
If both electrostatic forces and gravitons travel FTL, then there is a good chance that the photon is a subset of these higher frequencies and is created by the interactions between gravitational and electromagnetic forces. Further, the density strength of the electromagnetic fields and gravitational fields will affect the speed of light. Can light travel backwards in time? Yes, and I would also say that light can travel faster then the forward motion of time, which means that the electrostatic forces could actually also loop into forward time and an object could temporarily disappear and then reappear. Maybe light waves are dependent upon the surrounding electromagnetic fields and tunneling due to packets of photons surrounded by strong fields allows this displacement or faster then light speeds to take place with in (our) time."
.....Given these new findings about time, we may be in for a lot more surprises that may challenge existing theories of relativity regarding the interactions between forward and reverse time domains, which as noted by the results of John Hutchison effects with Tesla Coils and Van De Graf Generator most certainly may create all kinds of strange effects from levitation to reassembly of atomic structure creating cold welds of normally non mixable materials. I will next explore further Bill Alek's explanation of the Hutchison Effect.
John |
|
|
|
cosmicsurfer
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - 12 Oct 2005 : 14:48:46
|
Effects Powered by 'Neutrino-Capture' Technology
July 18, 2005: This new video clip shows Dr. Rex Webb demonstrating a glowing, ring-shaped device that exhibits Antigravity properties & a mysterious levitation. Webb's research has been causing a stir in the AG community since 2004, when Boyd Bushman began promoting Webb as discovering a new "Hutchison Effect".
Details on the exact nature of Webb's apparatus have not been forthcoming, but the inventor, located in Slidell, TX, claims that his research involves the capture & focusing of solar neutrino's through an optical assembly to power a coil system capable of producting "Hutchison-like Effects".
http://www.americanantigravity.com/articles/19/1/Rex-Webb-Neutrino-Antigravity-Video
VIDEO CLIP
http://www.americanantigravity.com/video/RexWebb_7_18_2005.wmv
"Why anti-gravity?" Read Dr. Rex Webb's explanation:
http://www.neutrinoscience.com/
|
|
|
|
PhilJ
USA
266 Posts |
Posted - 12 Oct 2005 : 16:33:26
|
Congrats, Dangus! You have more sense than I've been giving you credit for. I, however, prefer to stay out of this discussion. Its topic is an oxymoron; it almost matches the idiocy of that "hollow planet" theory.
[Edited by poster in response to LB's comment. Quite right, LB, I must be more careful to avoid personality clashes.] |
|
|
|
Patrick
USA
315 Posts |
Posted - 12 Oct 2005 : 19:34:03
|
WOW Comicsurfer, you sure have cut and pasted a whole bunch of info here,.
I really liked your post because it has lots of neat pictures and stuff.
I'm sorta a dummy so could you please tell me what causes gravity?
Thanks!
Patrick
|
|
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|
Antigravity Research
