Paradoxes Resolved, Origins Illuminated

Paradoxes Resolved, Origins Illuminated

Username:	Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

All Forums

Astrophysics

Gravity & Relativity

Frame Dragging

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:

UserName:

Password:

Format Mode:

Format:

Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON

Smilies

Check here to include your profile signature.
Check here to subscribe to this topic.

T O P I C R E V I E W
Astrodelugeologist	Posted - 21 Oct 2004 : 07:01:43 According to an article at http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/warp_space_041020.html, Einstein's predicted "frame dragging" has been confirmed by a new study. Tom, how does frame dragging fit into the Meta Model, if at all? --Astro
5 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First)
Meta	Posted - 15 Dec 2004 : 11:04:50 Silence...that stone cold response that says it all.... We can't refute it. Meta
Meta	Posted - 23 Oct 2004 : 12:57:33 You nor your lacky news oracles can tell if earth drags space or space drags earth. You only think you know that the Aether spins and you think the earth is the cause of it. http://www.rgrace.org/126/145gravframe.html Meta
Jim	Posted - 21 Oct 2004 : 11:41:04 Isn't the frame a model of sorts? Why would a frame exist to be measured in the real world? The dependance on models is as bad as having a dependance on drugs when these kinds of mixups happen.
tvanflandern	Posted - 21 Oct 2004 : 11:08:37 quote: Originally posted by Astrodelugeologist Tom, how does frame dragging fit into the Meta Model, if at all? It would take the form of "elysium dragging", which is mathematically similar. It is curious that this result is released at just this time. An expensive satellite, Gravity Probe B, was launched earlier in the year for the main purpose of testing frame dragging. The expense could not have been justified if an alternative way to test was already available. But so far, technical problems have interfered with GPB's experiment. This new result using Lageos satellites appears to undercut the rationale for having Gravity Probe B at all. So I wonder if this result was rushed to press to beat any potential GPB result next year, or if it was intended to soften the blow if GPB is a complete failure. -\|Tom\|-
Rudolf	Posted - 21 Oct 2004 : 10:19:39 I saw the article as well. Interesting to see how different people interpret results differently.

Paradoxes Resolved, Origins Illuminated

This page was generated in 0.44 seconds.